Brown v Eastern and Midlands Railway Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1888
Date1888
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
18 cases
  • DPP v Shorrt
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 19 June 2002
    ...Respondent and Frank Shortt, Applicant (No. 1) Cases mentioned in this report:- Brown v. The Eastern and Midlands Railway Company (1889) 22 Q.B.D. 391. Jones v. Stephens (1822) 11 Price 235. Kavanagh v. The Leader (1956) [2001] 1 I.R. 538. The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v. Mel......
  • Alcoa Minerals of Jamaica Incorporated v Broderick
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 11 November 1996
    ...and also that the other side has fair notice of it and is able to deal with it. Instances are: Brown v. Eastern Midlands Railway Co. [1889] 22 QBD 391, Moore v Ransome's dock Committee (1898) 14 TLR 539, Hayles v. Kerr [1908] 2 KB 601.” 73 (11B) What did the scientific evidence of the respo......
  • Mullan and Others v Forrester
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 14 June 1921
    ...Q. B. D. 199. (11) [1903] 2 I. R. 202. (12) [1898] 2 Q. B. 320. (13) 9 T. L. R. 480. (14) 21 Q. B. D. 398. (15) [1894] 1 Q. B. 164. (16) 22 Q. B. D. 391. (17) [1916] 1 K. B. 33. (18) L. R. 6 Q. B. 759. (19) 3 B. & Ad. 184. (20) [1917] A. C. 556. (1) 1 Q. B. D. (2) 3 C. P. D. 254. (3) Sir T.......
  • Mood Music Publishing Company Ltd v De Wolfe Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 October 1975
    ...the appeal with costs. THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS 23 Yes. So you go on and get on with the case, I suppose. 24 Mr. WILMERSBrown v. Eastern Railway (1889) 22 Q. B. D. 391, Moore v. Ransome's Dock (1898) 14 T. L. R. 539, Hales v. Kerr (1908) 2 K. S. 601. 17 The matter in issue in the present cas......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles