Brown v Eastern and Midlands Railway Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1888
Date1888
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
18 cases
  • DPP v Shorrt
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 19 June 2002
    ...Respondent and Frank Shortt, Applicant (No. 1) Cases mentioned in this report:- Brown v. The Eastern and Midlands Railway Company (1889) 22 Q.B.D. 391. Jones v. Stephens (1822) 11 Price 235. Kavanagh v. The Leader (1956) [2001] 1 I.R. 538. The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v. Mel......
  • Alcoa Minerals of Jamaica Incorporated v Broderick
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 11 November 1996
    ...and also that the other side has fair notice of it and is able to deal with it. Instances are: Brown v. Eastern Midlands Railway Co. [1889] 22 QBD 391, Moore v Ransome's dock Committee (1898) 14 TLR 539, Hayles v. Kerr [1908] 2 KB 601.” 73 (11B) What did the scientific evidence of the respo......
  • Mullan and Others v Forrester
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 14 June 1921
    ...Q. B. D. 199. (11) [1903] 2 I. R. 202. (12) [1898] 2 Q. B. 320. (13) 9 T. L. R. 480. (14) 21 Q. B. D. 398. (15) [1894] 1 Q. B. 164. (16) 22 Q. B. D. 391. (17) [1916] 1 K. B. 33. (18) L. R. 6 Q. B. 759. (19) 3 B. & Ad. 184. (20) [1917] A. C. 556. (1) 1 Q. B. D. (2) 3 C. P. D. 254. (3) Sir T.......
  • Mood Music Publishing Company Ltd v De Wolfe Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 October 1975
    ...the appeal with costs. THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS 23 Yes. So you go on and get on with the case, I suppose. 24 Mr. WILMERSBrown v. Eastern Railway (1889) 22 Q. B. D. 391, Moore v. Ransome's Dock (1898) 14 T. L. R. 539, Hales v. Kerr (1908) 2 K. S. 601. 17 The matter in issue in the present cas......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Browne v. Dunn and Similar Fact Evidence: Isles of Change in a Calm Civil Evidence Sea
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Special Lectures 2003. The Law of Evidence
    • 31 August 2004
    ...to deal with it.90 86 (1985), 3 C.P.C. (2d) 113 at 117 (Ont. H.C.) [Wilson]. See also Brown v. Eastern and Midlands Railway Company (1889), 22 Q.B.D. 391 at 393 (C.A.); Rock v. Canadian Northern R. Co., [1922] 66 D.L.R. 255 at 261 (Sask. C.A.); and Zigelstein v. Kent, [1939] O.W.N. 213 (H.C......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT