Brown v Gould

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1971
Date1971

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
85 cases
  • Pang Ten Fatt and Another v Tawau Transport Company Sdn Bhd and Others
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1993
  • Bushwall Properties Ltd v Vortex Properties Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 1656B–D , H–1657B ) ... May and Butcher Ltd v. The King (Note) [ 1934 ] 2 K.B. 17 , H.L.(E.); Brown v. Gould [ 1972 ] Ch. 53 and Lake v. Bayliss [ 1974 ] 1 W.L.R. 1073 applied ... (2) That although proviso ( a ) of section 3 (1) of ... ...
  • Klerk-Elias Liza v KT Chan Clinic Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 23 April 1993
    ... ... In Brown v Gould 2 at pp 56-58, Megarry J stated the basic principles applicable in cases of uncertainty. He said: ... In an unreported case, ... ...
  • Masa-Katsu Japanese Restaurant Pte Ltd v Amara Hotel Properties Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 23 June 1998
    ...28.The majority judgment in Klerk-Elias Liza was delivered by Karthigesu J (as he then was) who at pp 430, 431 referred to Brown v Gould [1972] Ch 53 and cited an extensive passage from the judgment of Megarry J at pp 56 to 58. I do not think it is necessary for the present purpose to cite ......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Certainty
    • United Kingdom
    • Oxford University Press Books and Journals Contract Law in Practice Part II. Formation
    • Invalid date
    ...[2016] EWHC 1575 (Comm), [2017] 1 BCLC 414 at [60], Leggatt J, citing Lord Tomlin in Hillas v Arcos [1932] All ER 494, 499 (HL); Brown v Gould [1972] Ch 53 at 56–​58; BJ Aviation Ltd v Pool Aviation Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 163, [2002] 2 P & CR 25 at [23]; Maple Leaf Macro Volatility Master Fund......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Invalid date
    ... ... �������������������������������������������3.178 ... Brown" & Davis Ltd v Galbraith [1972] 1 WLR 997 (CA)\b����������������������������������\xEF\xBF" Gould [1972] Ch 53 ... ...
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis The Law of Derivatives
    • Invalid date
    ...266 Brostoff v. Clark Kenneth Levethal, unreported, 11 March 1996 97 Brown v. GIO Insurance Ltd [1998] Lloyd's Rep IR 201 233, 234 Brown v. Gould [1972] Ch 53 177 Brown v. Raphael [1958] 1 Ch 636 79, 82 Brown Jenkinson v. Percy Dalton [1957] 2 QB 621 84 Buckinghamshire CC v. Moran [1989] 2 ......