Brown v Stott (Procurator Fiscal, Dunfermline)
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judge | Lord Bingham of Cornhill,Lord Steyn,Lord Hope of Craighead,Lord Clyde,The Rt. Hon. Ian Kirkwood (Lord Kirkwood) |
Judgment Date | 05 December 2000 |
Judgment citation (vLex) | [2000] UKPC J1205-1 |
Court | Privy Council |
Docket Number | DRA No. 3 of 2000,No 3 |
Date | 05 December 2000 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
406 cases
-
DPP v Wilson
...exclude it if there was any question of it having been obtained by oppression or in circumstances which rendered it unreliable. 2817. In the Brown case (see above) the Privy Council had concluded that the use of an admission obtained pursuant to paragraph (a) in section 172(2) was not incom......
-
Coventry and Others v Lawrence and another (No 3)
...assessment involves balancing conflicting interests falls within the State's wide discretionary area of judgment. As Lord Bingham said in Brown v Stott [2003] 1 AC 681, 703: "Judicial recognition and assertion of the human rights defined in the Convention is not a substitute for the proces......
-
R (Haase) v Independent Adjudicator
...fairness of a trial. 37 Lastly, Mr Perry submitted that the decision in Stow is inconsistent with the judgment of the Privy Council in Brown v Stott [2003] 1 AC 681, on the basis that the latter decision establishes that "What a fair trial requires cannot be the subject of a single, unvaryi......
-
Liberty Club Ltd v The Beacon Insurance Company Ltd
...to the court which is subject to limitations was explained, in terms that I adopt and apply, by Lord Bingham inBrown v Stott (PC) (2001) 2 W.LR. 817 at 826: "Article 6 contains no express right of access to a court, but inGolder v United Kingdom (1975) 1 EHRR 524 (1975) 1 EHRR 524, 536, par......
Request a trial to view additional results
37 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
.... .244Brogan v United Kingdom (1988) 11 EHRR 117. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .213Brown vStott [2003] 1AC 681. . . . . . . . . . . . 58–62Bushell’s Case (1670) Vaughan 135, 124 ER 1006. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......
-
Provocation: Speculative Defence Not to Be Left to the Jury
...different kinds of burden on a defendant. Field J in thepresent case (at [19]) draws on the decision of the Privy Council inBrown vStott [2001] 2 WLR 817, in which Lord Bingham stated, at836:The jurisprudence of the European Court very clearly establishes that whilethe overall fairness of a......
-
Table of Cases
...58, 322–328Bolkiah v KPMG [1998] UKHL 52, [1999]2 AC 222. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58Brown v Stott [2003] 1 AC 681, PC. . . . . . . . . . 335Bullivant v Attorney-General for Victoria[1901] AC 196. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .324Bullock v C......
-
Subject Index
...TelevisionLtd [1981]AC 1096 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346, 347Brown vRice [2007] EWHC625 (Ch). . . . . . . . . 243Brown vStott [2003] 1AC 681, PC . . . . . . 103, 104Byrne vDPP [2010] IEHC382 . . . . . . . . . . 170–172Cadder vHM Advocate [2010]UKSC 43 . . . . 70,73Cain v Francis [200......
Request a trial to view additional results