Brush v Bower Cotton & Bower (A Firm)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1993
Date1993
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Deutsche Bank AG v Sebastian Holdings Inc. and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Senior Court Costs Office
    • 1 January 2021
  • KPMG Peat Marwick McLintock v H.L.T. Group Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Ms Elinor Gorenstein v Sears Tooth Solicitors
    • United Kingdom
    • Senior Court Costs Office
    • 30 April 2025
    ...the Claimant's primary case is that all estimated time should be disallowed. The Claimant's secondary argument is as per Brush v Bower Cotton & Bower [1993] 4 All ER 741, such than any estimated time should be viewed with extreme 129 Mr Mason submits the sheer amount of estimated time is ve......
  • Elinor Gorenstein v Sears Tooth Solicitors
    • United Kingdom
    • Senior Court Costs Office
    • 30 April 2025
    ...the Claimant’s primary case is that all estimated time should be disallowed. The Claimant’s secondary argument is as per Brush v Bower Cotton & Bower [1993] 4 All ER 741, such than any estimated time should be viewed with extreme 129. Mr Mason submits the sheer amount of estimated time is v......
  • Get Started for Free