BSkyB Ltd and Another v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd and Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeThe Hon. Mr. Justice Ramsey,The Hon Mr Justice Ramsey:
Judgment Date26 January 2010
Neutral Citation[2010] EWHC 86 (TCC)
Docket NumberCase No: HT-06-311
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
Date26 January 2010

trong>301

Damages for breach of the Prime Contract as varied by the Letter of Agreement

302

Misrepresentation Damages: Increased Cost Damages

302

Misrepresentation Damages: Lost Benefit Damages

303

The Effort and time to implement the CRM System

303

PwC from July 2000: Scenario B1

304

ASI from July 2001: Scenario B2

306

Issues arising from the different approaches

308

PA's Approach

308

PwC's Estimate

308

The Siebel Package

311

Sky's requirements and Siebel

313

The Demonstrator

316

Conclusion on Siebel Fit

319

Estimating effort from PA's function point count

320

Accuracy of the Function Point Count

325

PA's conversion from Function Points to effort

326

Robert Worden's approach

331

PwC System estimate

332

Avoidable cost analysis

333

Cross-checks

336

Analysis

337

Dr Worden's use of SLOC and CoCoMo II

338

Summary on the approaches of the IT experts

343

Conclusions on Time and Cost of PwC implementing the CRM Project using Siebel (Scenario B1)

345

Conclusions on Time and Cost of an ASI implementing the CRM Project (Scenario B2)

348

Damages for breach of the Prime Contract prior to July 2001

350

Damages for breach of the Prime Contract as varied by the Letter of Agreement

351

L: MITIGATION

353

Introduction

353

Legal Principles

353

Issues of Mitigation

355

Sky's performance

355

The Standard of a Competent Systems Integrator

357

The time taken by Sky compared to the estimate for a CSI

359

The six complaints

360

De-scoping the three enhancements and failure to introduce interim Self Service

363

Earlier delivery of Self Service

366

Summary on Mitigation

370

M: BUSINESS BENEFITS

371

Introduction

371

The implementation of the Actual CRM System

372

Approach to the Business Benefits Claim

373

The 22 elements of functionality

374

Core Functionality

375

The three enhancements

384

Merlin: Elements 8 and 14

387

Merlin Functionality

388

Functional Specification 5 Cross/Up-Sell

389

Summary

397

Merlin

397

Conclusion on Merlin

398

Self Service: Element 16 to 21

398

Which elements of Self Service were within the scope of the PwC or ASI CRM Systems?

400

Case Management: Element 15

404

N: LOST BENEFITS: CHURN RATE REDUCTION

405

Introduction

405

The scope of the dispute between the Churn Rate experts

406

Functionality of the CRM System compared to DCMS

407

The KMS

407

The Actual CRM System

408

Merlin

408

Self Service

408

Case Management

408

Saveability of Cuscanners

408

State of the Nation and Tracker Reports

408

Premium and Basic Customers

409

Death of a customer

410

Percentages used by the experts

411

Home Moving

413

Value For Money

415

Subscription Fee Issues

416

Change in Financial Situation

417

Technical Issues (Part)

417

Poor Perception of Value

418

Contractual Account Issues (Part)

419

Summary of Value for Money

419

Customer Service

419

Service Issues

420

Technical Issues (Part)

420

Summary on Customer Service

421

System Cancellation or Syscan

421

The issues on Syscan

422

General Syscanners

422

The characteristics of general Syscanners

424

Does the CRM system help to save general Syscanners?

425

Hidden Cuscan

429

Saveability of Syscanners

431

Conclusion

432

O: LOST BENEFITS: CALL RATE REDUCTION

434

Introduction

434

The Experts

434

Self Service

434

Customer Service

435

Sales Upgrade

439

Technical Enquiry

439

Conclusion

441

Call Avoidance

441

First Time Resolution

442

Conclusion

445

Overall Conclusion

445

P: QUANTUM

447

Introduction

447

The quantum issues

448

Issue 1:

448

Issue 2:

449

Issue 3:

450

Issue 4:

451

Issue 5:

452

Issue 6:

452

Issue 7:

452

Issue 8:

456

Issue 9:

459

Issue 10:

460

Issue 11:

460

Other quantum issues

461

Losses of Sky

461

Ancillary calculations

461

EDS' Counterclaim

461

Q: OVERALL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

463

Provisions of the Prime Contract

463

Provisions of the Letter of Agreement

463

The Memorandum of Understanding

463

Duty of Care

463

Misrepresentations prior to the selection of EDS and the Letter of Intent

463

Misrepresentations prior to the Prime Contract

464

Misrepresentations prior to the Letter of Agreement

464

Liability for misrepresentations

465

Breach of the Prime Contract

465

Causation

465

Mitigation

466

Lost Business Benefits

466

Quantum Issues

467

Reservation

468

Postscript

468

The Hon Mr Justice Ramsey:

A: GENERAL BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION

Introduction

1

The Claimants in these proceedings, British Sky Broadcasting Limited ("BSkyB") and Sky Subscribers Services Limited ("SSSL") provide satellite broadcasting and related services. The

Defendants, Electronic Data Systems Limited (now HP Enterprise Services UK Limited)("EDSL") and Electronic Data Systems Corporation (now Electronic Data Systems LLC) ("EDSC") provide Information Technology services.
2

There are issues as to the extent to which BSkyB can pursue claims and the extent to which EDSC has liabilities arising from the matters alleged in these proceedings. It is therefore generally convenient to refer to the Claimants in the neutral term "Sky" and the Defendants as "EDS" in this judgment as a general description of one or both of the Claimants or Defendants without entering into that particular debate when rehearsing and dealing with the facts and allegations.

3

This case is concerned with the procurement of a new customer relationship management ("CRM") system so that Sky could provide improved service to its customers focussed, at least initially, on telephone contact between customers and the Customer Advisors ("CAs" also known as Customer Service Representatives "CSRs") at Sky call centres.

4

Following a tender process in 2000, Sky selected EDS to design, build, manage, implement and integrate the process and technology for the CRM System. After an initial Letter of Intent, SSSL entered into a contract with EDSL ("the Prime Contract") to provide the CRM System at Sky's existing contact centres located at Dunfermline and Livingston.

5

The relationship was not a success. There was a renegotiation in 2001 which led to a Letter of Agreement. Then in 2002 Sky took over the performance of EDS' role of Systems Integrator and a Memorandum of Understanding was signed. Sky alleges that EDS made fraudulent misrepresentations which led to EDS being selected, to a Letter of Intent and to the Prime Contract. They also allege that EDS made negligent representations prior to the Letter of Agreement.

6

Sky went on to provide a CRM System. Instead of the intended CRM Project going live on 31 July 2001 and being completed by 1 March 2002 at a baseline budget of £47.6m, Sky contend that the functionality for the CRM System was only completed in March 2006 at a cost of about £265m. In the Particulars of Claim as they stood at the commencement of the hearing Sky claimed damages of some £709m.

Sky Customer Relationship Management

7

The main method of contact between Sky and its customers is a telephone call to one of Sky's call centres, which are also referred to as contact centres. In addition to the telephone there are other channels of communication including fax, email, WAP, the internet and, in particular, Sky's digital set-top box.

8

The CRM System is therefore important to Sky's business and forms an essential part of all contact centre dealings with customers, as well as other "self-service" dealings by customers. It facilitates, governs and records all customer related transactions, such as setting up a new account, closing an account, reporting a fault, calling out an engineer or changing a package. It also allows Sky to bill and process payments from their customers.

9

In 2000, Sky perceived an urgent need to replace the existing Digital Customer Management System ("DCMS"). It was an old system built up over the years and there were concerns in its ability to allow Sky to deal with the increasing number of customers and services. It was also recognised that a new CRM system with enhanced functionality would bring business benefits to Sky, including a reduction in the number of customers who "churn" or leave Sky each year, known as the "churn rate". Sky therefore decided to undertake a project, referred to as the Sky CRM Project which included the provision of a new CRM system.

10

At the time, Sky operated a number of legacy systems in addition to DCMS. In summary, the systems consisted of:

(1) DCMS – which included billing and payment processing.

(2) The Subscriber Card Management System (SCMS): a system by which SSSL provided conditional access services to broadcasters including BSkyB and the management of 'smart' cards distributed to customers.

(3) The Management of Information for Digital and Analogue Systems (MIDAS): this was a data warehouse for the storing and retrieval of marketing and financial information.

(4) The Field Management System (FMS): a system that provided for all aspects of Sky installations.

11

The SCMS did not form part of the new CRM system but it was a system then...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • Axa Sun Life Services Plc v Mortgage UK Financial Services Ltd & others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • May 12, 2011
    ...collateral warranties but not misrepresentations, and to the clause considered by Ramsey J in BSkyB v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd [2010] EWHC 86 (TCC). Furthermore, there are, as Mr Picken accepted, well known contractual provisions that clearly and unequivocally refer to misrepresentatio......
  • Lakatamia Shipping Company Ltd v Nobu Su (aka Su Hsin Chi; aka Nobu Morimoto)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • July 8, 2021
    ...truth and that this destroys her credibility — to adopt the phrase used by Ramsey J in BskyB Limited v HP Enterprise Services UK Limited [2010] EWHC 86 (TCC) at [195]–[196] (after he had first identified relevant principles in this regard at [189]–[191], by reference to what was said by Fla......
  • Alan Bates and Others v Post Office Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • December 16, 2019
    ...including in what was at that time the biggest IT dispute tried, namely BSkyB Ltd v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd (formerly EDS Ltd) [2010] EWHC 86 (TCC). This case is notable for a range of reasons, not least that the judgment (excluding quantum) runs to some 2350 paragraphs; and also that......
  • Green Deal Marketing Southern Ltd v Economy Energy Trading Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • March 6, 2019
    ...acceptance can be inferred from conduct: Vitol SA v Norelf Ltd [1996] A.C. 800 at 811–812; BskyB Ltd v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd [2010] EWHC 86 (TCC) at 133 The conversations on 31 January 2017 could not have constituted acceptance by EE of a repudiation by GDM, for two reasons: first,......
  • Get Started for Free
8 firm's commentaries
  • Recent Contract Law Cases Relevant in the Financial Services Industry
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • August 3, 2011
    ...in the following areas: ...
  • Case Law Update - Issue 4 (2010)
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • July 22, 2010
    ...Wareing (on litigation costs) Misrepresentation and entire agreement BSkyB Ltd v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd [2010] BLR 267 and [2010] CILL 2841 TCC The CILL focuses on misrepresentation aspects of the judgment on BskyB's claim regarding its commissioning of a customer relationship manage......
  • Allocating Risk In IT Contracts
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • June 28, 2011
    ...(1854) 9 Exch 341 BSkyB Limited and another v HP Enterprise Services UK Limited (formerly Electronic Data Systems Limited) and another [2010] EWHC 86 (TCC), 26 January Thomas Witter Limited v TBP Industries Limited [1996] 2 All The content of this article is intended to provide a general gu......
  • Case Law Update Issue 5 (2010)
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • September 23, 2010
    ...not been entitled to rescind the contracts. Entire Agreement Clause and Misrepresentation BSkyB Ltd v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd [2010] 129 Con LR 147 and [2010] Con LJ Vol. 26 Issue 4 289 QBD BSkyB's claim concerned its commissioning of a customer relationship management system. Central......
  • Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
  • Dispute resolution
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • April 13, 2020
    ...see, eg, Carillion Construction Ltd v AIG Australia Ltd [2016] NSWSC 495. 256 See, eg, BSkyB Ltd v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd [2010] EWHC 86 (TCC) at [417]–[437], per Ramsey J. 1724 DISPUTE RESOLUTION intended to settle some claims but not all of them, even if a literal interpretation of......
  • Contract formation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • April 13, 2020
    ...per Maugham LJ; Whitehead Mann Ltd v Cheverny Consulting Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1303 at [42]; BSkyB Ltd v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd [2010] EWHC 86 (TCC) at [471]–[496], per Ramsey J; Malcolm Charles Contracts Ltd v Crispin [2014] EWHC 3898 (TCC) at [58], per Carr J; Bumi Armada Ofshore Hol......
  • Contract terms
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • April 13, 2020
    ...clauses, and the grounds upon which they can be attacked, are discussed in Chapter 13. 291 BSkyB Ltd v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd [2010] EWhC 86 (TCC) at [359]–[389], per ramsey J; Axa Sun Life Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd [2011] EWCa Civ 133; Alstom Ltd v Yokogawa Australia Pty Lt......
  • Procurement
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • April 13, 2020
    ...if the representation in question is accurate, even if it resulted from careless 469 BSkyB Ltd v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd [2010] EWhC 86 (TCC) at [304(3)] and [309]–[312], per ramsey J; ACTAtek, Inc v Tembusu Growth Fund Ltd [2016] SGCa 50 at [48]. 470 See Broadley Construction Pte Ltd......
  • Get Started for Free