Buchanan v Jennings

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeLord Bingham of Cornhill
Judgment Date14 July 2004
Neutral Citation[2004] UKPC 36
CourtPrivy Council
Docket NumberAppeal No. 53 of 2003
Date14 July 2004
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
50 cases
  • Dato Worawi Makudi v Baron Triesman of Tottenham in the London Borough of Haringey
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 1 February 2013
    ...Parliament, become liable for the statement made outside Parliament without the benefit of a defence of absolute privilege. Buchanan v Jennings [2004] UKPC 36 is an example. It is also common ground that whether a defendant is liable on that basis will be a matter of fact and degree. Byrne ......
  • Curistan v Times Newspapers Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 25 April 2007
  • Mees v Roads Corporation
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • British Telecommunications Plc v BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 December 2018
    ...giving the advice of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Buchanan v Jennings (Attorney General of New Zealand intervening) [2005] 1 AC 115, para 13: ‘It is common ground in this appeal that statements made outside Parliament are not protected by absolute privilege even if they si......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT