Bullock v Corry

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1877
Date1877
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Pearce v Foster
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • University College Cork - National University of Ireland v The Electricity Supply Board
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 21 March 2014
    ...85. Brady v. Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] IEHC 231, (Unreported, High Court, Kearns P., 23rd April, 2010). Bullock v. Corry (1878) 3 Q.B.D. 356. Calcraft v. Guest [1898] 1 Q.B. 759. Downey v. Murray [1988] N.I. 600. Gallagher v. Stanley [1998] 2 I.R. 267. Hickman v. Taylor (1947) ......
  • KETUA PENGARAH HASIL DALAM NEGERI vs BAR MALAYSIA
    • Malaysia
    • Magistrates Court (Malaysia)
    • 27 October 2021
    ...had failed to recognise the common law maxim 'once privileged, always privileged' (see per Cockburn CJ in Bullock & Co v Corry & Co (1878) 3 QBD 356 at p 358) as being embodied in ss 126–129 of the Act. This common law maxim has been endorsed and approved by the high authority of the House ......
  • Protasco Bhd v Pt Anglo Slavic Utama
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2015
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 11-4, October 2007
    • 1 October 2007
    .... . . . . . 335Bullivant v Attorney-General for Victoria[1901] AC 196. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .324Bullock v Corry (1878) 3 QBD 356. . . . . . . . . . 323Burning v Cross (1978) 141 CLR 54. . . . . . . 87–90Burrell v R [2007] NSWCCA 65. . . . 233, 234, 236Burstein v Tim......
  • Litigation Privilege: Transient or Timeless? Blank v Canada (Minister of Justice)
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 11-4, October 2007
    • 1 October 2007
    ...11 E & P 49.12 See the authorities referred to in Blank [2006] 2 SCR 319 at [36].13 [1898] 1 QB 759 at 761. See also Bullock vCorry (1878) 3 QBD 356 at 358–9.14 Hobbs vHobbs and Cousens [1960] P 112 at that never took place.15 Nor does it matter that the client has died.16 The privilegewill......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT