Bulstrode v Lambert
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1953 |
| Year | 1953 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
52 cases
-
Keefe v Amor
...because he felt himself bound to do so by the decision of Mr. Justice Upjohn (as he then was) in ( Bulstrode v. Lambert 1953 1 Weekly Law Reports, page 1064). In that case there was at the time of the grant a gateway and an overhead bar which would have limited the size of vehicles having a......
-
Perlman v Rayden
...of Finance v Clark (No 2) and White v Richards [1993] 68 P&CR 105, the physical circumstances did so operate. But, by contrast, in Bulstrode v Lambert [1953] 1 WLR 1064, Keefe v Amor [1965] 1 QB 234 and Charles v Beach [1993] EGCS 124 they did not." 43 The issue which arose in the St Edmund......
-
Snell & Prideaux Ltd (Plaintiff v Dutton Mirrors Ltd (Defendant
...it is necessary to give effect to the right of way at all that the courts will construe it as giving a right to stop and unload: see Bulstrode v. Lambert [1953] 1 WLR 1064 and McIlraith v. Grady [1968] 1 QB 468. In London and Suburban Land and Building Co. (Holdings) Ltd v. Carey (1991) 62 ......
-
St. Edmundsbury and Ipswich Diocesan Board of Finance v Clark (No. 2)
...Further, in more than one case since 1925, Judges of high authority took it for granted that the old principle still prevails: see Bulstrode v. Lambert (1953 1 Weekly Law Reports, per Mr. Justice Upjohn at page 1068); Mason v. Clarke (1954- 1 Queen's Bench, 460, in the Court of Appeal, per ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Construction Of A Right Of Way
...kind may be had to any increased extent which the physical state of the way will for the time being allow - see Bulstrode v Lambert [1953] 1 W.L.R. 1064, where the vehicles, the use of the yard by which was expressly authorised, were not confined to such as could originally have passed thro......
-
Don't Lose Your Way! 3 Misunderstood Aspects Of The Law Of Rights Of Way
...pass to an auction mart included a right to load and unload as this was necessary for the enjoyment of the right (Bulstrode v Lambert [1953] 1 WLR 1064). A full right to park can be expressly granted or implied; it a valid easement (Moncreiff v Jamieson [2007] UKHL 42). It is possible for a......
-
Don't Lose Your Way! 3 Misunderstood Aspects Of The Law Of Rights Of Way
...pass to an auction mart included a right to load and unload as this was necessary for the enjoyment of the right (Bulstrode v Lambert [1953] 1 WLR 1064). A full right to park can be expressly granted or implied; it a valid easement (Moncreiff v Jamieson [2007] UKHL 42). It is possible for a......