Bulstrode v Lambert

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1953
Year1953
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
50 cases
  • Keefe v Amor
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 16 Abril 1964
    ...because he felt himself bound to do so by the decision of Mr. Justice Upjohn (as he then was) in ( Bulstrode v. Lambert 1953 1 Weekly Law Reports, page 1064). In that case there was at the time of the grant a gateway and an overhead bar which would have limited the size of vehicles having a......
  • St. Edmundsbury and Ipswich Diocesan Board of Finance v Clark (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Snell & Prideaux Ltd (Plaintiff v Dutton Mirrors Ltd (Defendant
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 Abril 1994
    ...the layout of property as it existed or was contemplated at the time of the grant. With that general proposition I agree. The case of Bulstrode v. Lambert [1953] 1 WLR certainly provides some authority for it. I am not so certain about the case of McIlraith v. Grady [1968] 1 QB 468 upon whi......
  • Perlman v Rayden
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 7 Octubre 2004
    ...v Clark (No 2) and White v Richards [1993] 68 P&CR 105, the physical circumstances did so operate. But, by contrast, in Bulstrode v Lambert [1953] 1 WLR 1064, Keefe v Amor [1965] 1 QB 234 and Charles v Beach [1993] EGCS 124 they did not." 43 The issue which arose in the St Edmundsbury c......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • Construction Of A Right Of Way
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 9 Octubre 2023
    ...kind may be had to any increased extent which the physical state of the way will for the time being allow - see Bulstrode v Lambert [1953] 1 W.L.R. 1064, where the vehicles, the use of the yard by which was expressly authorised, were not confined to such as could originally have passed thro......
  • Don't Lose Your Way! 3 Misunderstood Aspects Of The Law Of Rights Of Way
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 28 Agosto 2021
    ...pass to an auction mart included a right to load and unload as this was necessary for the enjoyment of the right (Bulstrode v Lambert [1953] 1 WLR 1064). A full right to park can be expressly granted or implied; it a valid easement (Moncreiff v Jamieson [2007] UKHL 42). It is possible for a......
  • Don't Lose Your Way! 3 Misunderstood Aspects Of The Law Of Rights Of Way
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 28 Agosto 2021
    ...pass to an auction mart included a right to load and unload as this was necessary for the enjoyment of the right (Bulstrode v Lambert [1953] 1 WLR 1064). A full right to park can be expressly granted or implied; it a valid easement (Moncreiff v Jamieson [2007] UKHL 42). It is possible for a......