Bunge Corporation New York v Tradax Export S.A. Panama

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1980
Date1980
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
40 cases
  • Thai Maparn Trading Company Ltd v Louis Drefyus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 4 October 2011
    ...the required 15 days notice would have ended after the last possible date for shipment: see the finding in the Court of Appeal, [1980] 1 Lloyd's Rep.294 at 301, which was not challenged in the House of Lords. In Cargill v Continental the notice in respect of the substitute vessel was too la......
  • Canberra Advance Bank Ltd v Benny
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Compagnie Commerciale Sucres et Denrees v C Czarnikow Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 11 October 1990
    ...party is relieved of his liability." 40 Having referred to, amongst other authorities, the Bunge Corporation case, Kerr L.J. observed [1981] 1 W.L.R. 711 at p. 283: "At the end of the day, if there is no other more specific guide to the correct solution to a particular dispute, the court m......
  • Dominion Corporate Trustees Ltd and Others v Debenhams Properties Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 27 May 2010
    ... ... very recent case, Miramar Maritime Corporation v. Holborn Oil Trading Ltd ... [1984] A.C. 676 , ... upon the decision of the House of Lords in Bunge Corporation, New York v Tradax Export SA Panama ... ...
  • Get Started for Free