C.C.C. Films (London) Ltd v Impact Quadrant Films Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Year1984
Date1984

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
50 cases
  • Gerbang Perdana Sdn Bhd v MTD ACPIEngineering Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2016
  • Elena Baturina v Alexander Chistyakov
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 10 May 2017
    ...of probabilities) that the claimant would not have in fact recovered those sums: C.C.C Films (London) Ltd v Impact Quadrant Films Ltd [1985] Q.B. 16 at [39] to [42]. In the absence of such proof, the court will assume in the claimant's favour that he would have recouped all the costs incurr......
  • Soteria Insurance Ltd (formerly CIS General Insurance Ltd) v IBM United Kingdom Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 April 2022
    ...High Court of Australia in The Commonwealth of Australia v Amman and by the English Courts in C&P Haulage v Middleton and CCC Films v Impact Quadrant Films Limited. Thus, notwithstanding my unfeigned respect for any opinion of Professor Treitel, I am unable to accept that there are two prin......
  • CIS General Insurance Ltd v IBM United Kingdom Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 19 February 2021
    ...to put a plaintiff in a better financial position than if the contract had been properly performed.” 676 In CCC Films (London) Ltd v Impact Quadrant Films Ltd [1985] 1 QB 16 (QBD) the court considered the burden of proving that a claimant had suffered no damage in claims for wasted expendit......
  • Get Started for Free
6 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • 21 June 2014
    ...BCSC 1778 ....................................................... 76, 466, 473 CCC Films (London) Ltd v Impact Quadrant Films Ltd (1984), [1985] QB 16, [1984] 3 All ER 298, [1984] 3 WLR 245 ...........................51, 57 Centennial Centre of Science & Technology v VS Services Ltd (1982),......
  • Compensation for Harm to Economic Interests
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Compensatory Damages
    • 21 June 2014
    ...ONCA 412 [ PreMD Inc ]. 109 [1972] 1 QB 60 (CA) [ Anglia Television ]. See also CCC Films (London) Ltd v Impact Quadrant Films Ltd , [1984] 3 All ER 298 (QBD) [ CCC Films ]. R EMEDIES: THE LAW OF DAMAGES 52 have been — he can claim in the alternative the expenditure which has been thrown aw......
  • Damages
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Remedies
    • 4 August 2020
    ...losses in such circumstances, the burden to demonstrate loss is imposed on the defendant. See CCC Films Ltd v Impact Quadrant Films Ltd , [1985] 1 QB 16. 72 See, for example, Bowlay Logging Ltd v Domtar Ltd (1982), 135 DLR (3d) 179 at 182–83 (BCCA), aff’g (1978), 87 DLR (3d) 325 (BCSC) (pay......
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...had made a bad bargain (and it would be for the defendant to prove that such had been the case (CCC Films (London) v Impact Quadrant Films[1985] QB 16 at 38; cited with approval in Out of the Box Pte Ltd v Wanin Industries Pte Ltd[2012] 3 SLR 428 at [8] – though see also the discussion of t......
  • Get Started for Free