C. v C. (Non-molestation Order: Jurisdiction)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date11 November 1997
Date11 November 1997
CourtFamily Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Yunus Manjra v Rehma Shaikh
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 8 July 2020
    ...clearly harasses and affects the applicant to such a degree that the intervention of the court is called for” ( C v C (Non-molestation Order: Jurisdiction) [1998] 1 FLR 554), but by considering whether there was any prejudice to the husband in its continuation. This error in her approach is......
  • R v O'Neill
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 23 March 2016
    ...are sought — or, at least, this wording is very widely used. In this regard, the observations of Sir Stephen Brown P, in C v C [1998] Fam. 70, at 73, are instructive as to the gravity which is required before the law is engaged: "…. [Molestation] implies some quite deliberate conduct which ......
  • Re T (A Child)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 November 2017
    ...It must be conduct of 'such a degree of harassment as to call for the intervention of the court' ( Horner v Horner and C v B). Although in C v C the phrase 'was calculated to cause alarm and distress' was used, none of the authorities require that a positive intent to molest must be establi......
  • Re Alwyn (non-molestation proceedings by a child)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division (Northern Ireland)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free