C v D

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2008
Year2008
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Sonera Holding B.v Appellant v Cukurova Holding A.S. Respondent
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Court of Appeal (British Virgin Islands)
    • 23 June 2016
    ...25 See: Naviera Amazonica Peruana SA v Compania Internacional De Seguros Del Peru [1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep 116 per Kerr LJ at pp. 119–120; C v D [2008] Bus LR 843 per Longmore LJ at para. 26 Stephen M. Schwebel, Anti-Suit Injunctions in International Arbitration: An Overview (2005). 27 335 F.3d......
  • AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 May 2011
    ...section 37. Indeed, if it were otherwise, The Siskina [1979] AC 210 would now be decided differently. 1 See C v. D [2007] EWCA 1282, [2008] Bus LR 843, where the underlying contract was governed by New York law, but the arbitration clause was governed by English law. 2 Albeit in Vale do Ri......
  • Anatolie Stati v The Republic of Kazakhstan
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 August 2018
    ...the issue referred to arbitration is to be determined in accordance with the laws of another country (see C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282; [2008] Bus LR 843). Article V of the Convention sets out the only grounds on which enforcement of a foreign award may be refused. These include in art V(1)(......
  • Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi A.S. v OOO “Insurance Company Chubb”
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 April 2020
    ...of an arbitration is analogous to an exclusive jurisdiction clause”. These statements have been approved twice by this court, in C v D [2008] Bus LR 843, [17], per Longmore LJ and very recently in Minister of Finance v IPIC [2019] EWCA Civ 2080, [37], per Vos 48 Lord Hoffmann's suggestion ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Enka v Chubb: The Nuanced Presumptions "Test" on the Law of Arbitration Agreements
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 1 December 2020
    ...decisions falling on either side of this divide: Sulamérica Cia Nacional de Seguros SA v Enesa Engenharia SA [2013] 1 WLR 102 and C v D [2008] Bus LR 843”. The Supreme Court decided that, as a starting point, the arbitration agreement is governed by: (i) the law expressly or impliedly chose......
  • Enka v Chubb: The Nuanced Presumptions 'test' On The Law Of Arbitration Agreements
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 1 December 2020
    ...decisions falling on either side of this divide: Sulamérica Cia Nacional de Seguros SA v Enesa Engenharia SA [2013] 1 WLR 102 and C v D [2008] Bus LR 843".4 The Supreme Court decided that, as a starting point, the arbitration agreement is governed by: (i) the law expressly or impliedly chos......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT