Cadle Company, The v Hearley
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2002 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Bradford & Bingley Plc v Rashid
...be paid, that would seem to me a very substantial enlargement of its scope. Save for a single case in the Bristol Mercantile Court— The Cadle Co v Hearley [2002] 1 Lloyds LR 143, a first instance decision of Judge Havelock-Allan QC, not in fact referred to by the Court of Appeal in the pre......
-
Rwe Npower Plc v Alstom Power Ltd
...permissible to have regard to without prejudice communications in order to prove that there had been an acknowledgment of title. In The Cadle Co. v Hearley [2002] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 143), I held that it was not permissible to go behind the cloak of without prejudice privilege to establish that ......
-
Kim Eng Securities Pte Ltd v Tan Suan Khee
......Company in respect of transactions dealt by or through the Remisier in the name of the Company (hereinafter ... v Greater London Council and Another [1989] AC 1280 (“ Rush & Tompkins ”) and The Cadle Co v Hearley [2002] 1 Lloyd’s Law Rep 143 (“ The Cadle case ”) in argument. If the e-mail ......
-
Sovereign Dimensional Survey Limited For An Order Under Section 1 Of The Administration Of Justice Act 1972
...of fact. The difference in approach between the two jurisdictions was highlighted in the English case of The Cadle Co v Hearley [2002] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 143, where the decisions in Daks v Kuiper and Richardson v Quercus on which one party sought to rely were specifically disapproved as not rep......