Cambridge Nutrition Ltd v British Broadcasting Corporation

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1990
Year1990
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
56 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • RESTRAINING A CALL ON A PERFORMANCE BOND: SHOULD ‘FRAUD OR UNCONSCIONABILITY’ BE THE NEW ORTHODOXY?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2000, December 2000
    • 1 December 2000
    ...or upon such terms and conditions as the court thinks just and convenient that such order should be made. [emphasis mine] 94 [1990] 3 All ER 523, at 534 (per Kerr LJ). See also Series 5 Software v Clarke[1996] 1 All ER 853. 95 See also similar comments by Warren Khoo J on the American Cyana......
  • The Relevane of Constitutional Rights to the Granting of an Interlocutory Injunction
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 12-2013, January 2013
    • 1 January 2013
    ...Ireland , 2nd edn (Dublin: Bloomsbury Professional, 2011), p.292 32 American Cyanamid , supra note 9 33 Cambridge Nutrition Ltd v BBC [1990] 3 All ER 523, p.535 per Kerr LJ 34 Kirwan, “ Campus Oil Turns Twenty-Five: Is There Much to Celebrate?” (2008) 15 Dublin University Law Journal 325, p......
  • How are offers for minority securities enforced in corporate law?
    • South Africa
    • Journal of Corporate Commercial Law & Practice No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...that there was a breach of a contract or a breach of a stipulation except in the clearest possible case’; Cambridge Nutrition v BBC [1990] 3 All ER 523; Evans Marshall and Co Ltd v Bertola SA [1973] 1 All ER 992 at 1005: ‘The standard question in relation to the grant of an injunction, are ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT