Campbell (or Pearson) v Imray

JurisdictionScotland
Date2003
CourtCourt of Session (Outer House)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Dudarec v Andrews and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • March 22, 2006
    ...Walker LJ seemed to agree, but it is less clear whether Sir Richard Scott V.C. did. 34 We were also referred in this context to Campbell (or Pearson) v Imray [2004] P.N.L.R. 1 where Lord Emslie in the Court of Session expressed strong disagreement with views of Swinton Thomas LJ stating tha......
  • Spire Property Development LLP v Withers LLP
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • July 19, 2022
    ...(“ Investors Friend”); Crossnan v Ward Bracewell & Co [1984] PN 103 (“ Crossnan”); Cade v Cade 71 SASR 571 (“ Cade”); Campbell v Imray [2004] PNLR 1 (“ Campbell”); Shepherd v Byrne and Partners LLP [2017] EWHC Ch; Lloyd's Rep FC 8 (“ Shepherd”). These authorities fall into two categories: t......
  • Catriona Peat And David Kerr Executors Over The Estate Of The Late Margaret Gilfillan Colquhoun Peat Against Assembly Theatre Limited
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • September 25, 2014
    ...McCrindle Group Limited v Maclay Murray & Spens [2013] CSOH 72; Smith v Lindsay & Kirk (No.2) [2002] SLT 335; Campbell or Pearson v Imray [2004] PNLR 1). They would also have the considerable delay, expense and inconvenience of such an action. [17] The defenders would not be prejudiced by l......
  • Mrs Jean Edwards v Hugh James Ford Simey (A Firm)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • June 6, 2018
    ...agree, but it is less clear whether Sir Richard Scott VC did. 34. We were also referred in this context to Campbell (or Pearson) v Imray [2004] PNLR 1 where Lord Emslie in the Court of Session expressed strong disagreement with views of Swinton Thomas LJ, stating that it was not legitimate ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Valuing Bungled Litigation, Edwards v Hugh James Ford Simey
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • June 22, 2018
    ...be seen by considering a number of different factual scenarios. I will start with problems identifed by Lord Emslie in Campbell v Imray [2004] PNLR 1 at para. [49], and then add some of my own. The Judge "Suppose A and B suffer substantially the same injuries in the same accident caused by ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT