Cantor Fitzgerald v Bird

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2002
Year2002
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
16 cases
  • Tullett Prebon Plc and Others v BGC Brokers LP and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 18 March 2010
    ...The position of the recruiting employer who takes a chance on constructive dismissal arose in a case closer to the present, Cantor Fitzgerald v Bird [2002] IRLR 867. There three employees claimed to have been constructively dismissed. Two made out their claim. The third, Mr Boucher, did not......
  • Quilter Private Client Advisers Ltd v Emma Falconer
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 4 December 2020
    ...context – ‘essentially the legal embodiment of the everyday concept of “letting bygones be bygones”’ ( Cantor Fitzgerald v. Bird [2002] IRLR 867, paragraph 129, per McCombe J) — should, it is said, be something that the court should not be too ready to find having regard to the onerous stat......
  • Cook v Ministry of Sound Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 July 2009
    ...employment context—'essentially the legal embodiment of the everyday concept of “letting bygones be bygones”'( Cantor Fitzgerald v. Bird [2002] IRLR 867, paragraph 129, per McCombe J)—should, it is said, be something that the court should not be too ready to find having regard to the onero......
  • Dafiaghor-Olomu v Community Integrated Care and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Employee Competition: Recent Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 7 July 2010
    ...albeit brief, summary of the principles relevant to affirmation of employment contracts, by reference to Cantor Fitzgerald v Bird [2002] IRLR 867 ("essentially the legal embodiment of the everyday concept of letting bygones be bygones" per McCombe J) and Cox Toner v Crook [1981] IRLR 443. R......