Cantor Fitzgerald v Bird
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 2002 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 cases
-
Cook v Ministry of Sound Ltd
...Affirmation in the employment context—'essentially the legal embodiment of the everyday concept of “letting bygones be bygones”'( Cantor Fitzgerald v. Bird [2002] IRLR 867, paragraph 129, per McCombe J)—should, it is said, be something that the court should not be too ready to find having ......
-
Sheridan vs Peninsula Business Services,B Stern-Gillet
...conduct of the employer’s business and the employer’s treatment of his employees. In the case of Cantor Fitzgerald International v Bird [2002] IRLR 867, it was held by the High Court, over-aggressive promotion of proposed changes to terms and conditions by a particular manager, including th......
-
Tullett Prebon Plc and Others v BGC Brokers LP and Others
...152 The position of the recruiting employer who takes a chance on constructive dismissal arose in a case closer to the present, Cantor Fitzgerald v Bird [2002] IRLR 867. There three employees claimed to have been constructively dismissed. Two made out their claim. The third, Mr Boucher, did......
-
Quilter Private Client Advisers Ltd v Emma Falconer
...context – ‘essentially the legal embodiment of the everyday concept of “letting bygones be bygones”’ ( Cantor Fitzgerald v. Bird [2002] IRLR 867, paragraph 129, per McCombe J) — should, it is said, be something that the court should not be too ready to find having regard to the onerous stat......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Employee Competition: Recent Cases
...albeit brief, summary of the principles relevant to affirmation of employment contracts, by reference to Cantor Fitzgerald v Bird [2002] IRLR 867 ("essentially the legal embodiment of the everyday concept of letting bygones be bygones" per McCombe J) and Cox Toner v Crook [1981] IRLR 443. R......