Capital and Counties Bank. Ltd v Henty
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1881 |
| Year | 1881 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
90 cases
-
Grubb v Bristol United Press Ltd
...not be followed since that would be out of accord with many cases in this Court and the House of Lords, and in particular with Capital and Counties Bank v. Henty, Law Reports 7 Appeal Cases, 741. Those cases were not cited to the Court in Loughans' case. If and so far as is necessary, he as......
-
Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd; Rubber Improvement Ltd v Daily Telegraph Ltd; Rubber Improvement Ltd v Associated Newspapers Ltd
... ... 19, r. 6 (2) (post, p. 1091 ) ... Capital and Counties Bank Ltd. v. George Henty & Sons ( 1882 ) 7 App.Cas ... ...
-
Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd; Rubber Improvement Ltd v Daily Telegraph Ltd; Rubber Improvement Ltd v Associated Newspapers Ltd
...for the conclusion and meaning which persons will reasonably draw from and put upon the document" (per Lord Justice Cotton, Capital and Counties Bank v. Henty in the Court of Appeal 5 Common Pleas Division, page 514, at page 54-6). An innuendo is a defamatory imputation which extrinsic fact......
-
Jeyaretnam JB v Lee Kuan Yew
...made his remarks recklessly: at [60] and [61]. Bernstein v The Observer The Times (5 May 1976) (folld) Capital & Counties Bank v Henty (1882) 7 AppCas 741 (folld) Cassel & Co v Broome [1972] AC 1027 (folld) E Hulton & Co v Jones [1910] AC 20 (folld) Grubb v Bristol United Press Ltd [1963] 1......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Selected Judgments
...not the article conveyed the extended meaning averred, the judge applied the test laid down in Capital and Counties Bank Ltd v Henty (1882) 7 App Cas 741, at 745; that is, what meaning would the article convey to the ordinary man? This aspect of the law of libel was considered at some lengt......
-
DUTY OF TRIAL JUDGE IN DEFAMATION CASES
...do in fact convey a defamatory meaning. See Jones v. Skelton (1963) 1 W.L.R. at p. 1376 (P.C.); Capital and Counties Bank v. Henty (1882) 7 App. Cas. 741. If a publication, either standing alone, or taken in connection with other circumstances, is reason-ably capable of a libelous construct......