Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date1893
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
214 cases
  • Schuldenfrei v Hilton (Inspector of Taxes)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 10 February 1998
    ...BTC 226 (CA); [1988] BTC 268 (HL); 62 TC 1 Bradley (HMIT) v London Electricity plc TAX[1996] BTC 95 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball CoELR [1893] 1 QB 256 CL Nye Ltd, ReELR [1971] Ch 442 Felthous v BindleyENR (1862) 11 CBNS 869 R v HM Inspector of Taxes, ex parte Bass Holdings Ltd TAXTAX[1993]......
  • Rana v University of South Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Mr Roderick Ewan Irvine v The General Medical Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 14 August 2017
    ...cover from MPS or, latterly, MDU. 51 In support of his submissions, Mr Stockinger relied heavily on the well-known case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1893] 1 QB 256. The Defendants in that case published an advertisement stating that a reward of £100 would be paid to any person ......
  • Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn Bhd v Pesaka Saujana Development Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2012
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
25 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Saggerson on Travel Law and Litigation - 7th Edition Contents
    • 30 August 2022
    ...Plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605, [1990] 2 WLR 358, [1990] 1 All ER 568, (1990) 134 SJ 494, HL 6.151, 8.34 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256, 62 LJQB 257, 67 LT 837, 57 JP 325, 41 WR 210, 9 TLR 124, 4 R 176, CA 6.8 Carroll v Garford (1968) 112 SJ 948, (1968) The Times , 22 Novem......
  • Contract formation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...TCC, HHJ Bowsher QC, 9 November 2000). 125 Great Northern Railway v Witham (1873) LR 9 CP 16; Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256; Intense Investments Ltd v Development Ventures Ltd [2006] EWHC 1586 (TCC) at [73]–[74], per HHJ Coulson QC. 126 Intense Investments Ltd v Developme......
  • Upsetting the Apple Cart: Certifying Class Actions for Food Labelling Reform
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 11-1, October 2015
    • 1 October 2015
    ...puffs are insincere sales claims not meant to be taken seriously or to have legal consequences: see Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co, [1893] 1 QB 256 * CCAR 11-1.indb 95 10/19/2015 11:49:47 AM 96 The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview government-imposed regulations may not be stringent enou......
  • Mi Casa Es Su Casa: Van Breda as the House Rule for Global Securities Class Actions in Ontario
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 11-1, October 2015
    • 1 October 2015
    ...puffs are insincere sales claims not meant to be taken seriously or to have legal consequences: see Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co, [1893] 1 QB 256 * CCAR 11-1.indb 95 10/19/2015 11:49:47 AM 96 The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview government-imposed regulations may not be stringent enou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT