Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1929
Year1929
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
55 cases
  • Morgan v Odhams Press Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 February 1970
    ...told the jury to put their evidence on one side. 30 The only cases, of which know, which are inconsistent with this principle are Cassidy v. Daily Mirror. ( 1929 2 K. B. 331); and Hough v. London Express, ( 1940 2 K. B. 507), which followed it. In Cassidy's. Case, the Daily Mirror publish......
  • Taveta Investments Ltd v The Financial Reporting Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 29 June 2018
    ...are rare: Stern v Piper [1997] QB 123, 136Bper Simon Brown LJ; vii) the meaning the publisher intended to convey is irrelevant: Cassidy v Daily Mirror [1929] 2 KB 331, 354per Russell LJ; viii) for a viable defamation claim, the words complained of must refer to the claimant. The claimant ne......
  • Wong Yoke Kong v Azmi M Anshar
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2003
  • Janet Jagan and Another v Linden Forbes Sampson Burnham
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Cases referred to in 1983
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1983 Preliminary Sections
    • 22 November 2022
    ...Counties Bank v. Henty (1882) A.C. 745 23 Carter v Potato Marketing Board (1951) 84 C.L.R. 460 317 Cassidy v. Daily Mirror Newspapers (1929) 2 K.B. 331. 23 Caulcrick v. Harding (1926) 7 N L R 48 417 Chief Akin Omoboriowo and 1 Or. v. Chief M. Adekunle Ajasin S.C. 98. 1983. 564 Chief Effiong......
  • REPUTATION AND DEFAMATORY MEANING ON THE INTERNET
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...of the target population). 47Rubber Improvement Ltd v Daily Telegraph Ltd[1964] AC 234. 48 See Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers[1929] 2 KB 331; Grubb v Bristol United Press [1963] 1 QB 309; and Fullam v Newcastle Chronicle & Journal Ltd[1977] 1 WLR 651. 49[2012] EWHC B3 at [78]. 50 Matthew......
  • DUMBO & ORS V. IDUGBOE
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1983 Cases reported in 1983
    • 22 November 2022
    ...CASES REFERRED TO IN JUDGMENT. 1. Phillip Ezekwe v. E.T. Otomewo & Ors. (1957) W.R.N.L.R. 130. 30 2. Cassidy v. Daily Mirror Newspapers (1929) 2 K.B. 331. 3. Cook v. Ward (1830) 4 Moo & p.111. 4. Morris v. Sandess Universe Products (1954) 1 All E.R. 47. 5. Morgan v. Odhams Press Ltd. & Anor......
  • Identification of the Plaintiff
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Libel and Slander Actions
    • 17 June 2004
    ...show that the libel was not of and concerning the plaintiff by proving that he never heard of the plaintiff. Cassidy v. Daily Mirror, [1929] 2 K.B. 331 per Scrutton LJ. at 341 (C.A.). Newstead v. London Express Newspapers, [1940] 1 K.B. 377, per Sir Wilfred Green M.R. at 387. 25 0 CANADIA N......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT