Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1929
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
53 cases
  • Morgan v Odhams Press Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • February 20, 1970
    ...told the jury to put their evidence on one side. 30 The only cases, of which know, which are inconsistent with this principle are Cassidy v. Daily Mirror. ( 1929 2 K. B. 331); and Hough v. London Express, ( 1940 2 K. B. 507), which followed it. In Cassidy's. Case, the Daily Mirror publish......
  • Taveta Investments Ltd v The Financial Reporting Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • June 29, 2018
    ...are rare: Stern v Piper [1997] QB 123, 136Bper Simon Brown LJ; vii) the meaning the publisher intended to convey is irrelevant: Cassidy v Daily Mirror [1929] 2 KB 331, 354per Russell LJ; viii) for a viable defamation claim, the words complained of must refer to the claimant. The claimant ne......
  • Wong Yoke Kong v Azmi M Anshar
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • January 1, 2003
  • Janet Jagan and Another v Linden Forbes Sampson Burnham
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Cases referred to in 1983
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1983 Preliminary Sections
    • November 22, 2022
    ...Counties Bank v. Henty (1882) A.C. 745 23 Carter v Potato Marketing Board (1951) 84 C.L.R. 460 317 Cassidy v. Daily Mirror Newspapers (1929) 2 K.B. 331. 23 Caulcrick v. Harding (1926) 7 N L R 48 417 Chief Akin Omoboriowo and 1 Or. v. Chief M. Adekunle Ajasin S.C. 98. 1983. 564 Chief Effiong......
  • REPUTATION AND DEFAMATORY MEANING ON THE INTERNET
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2015, December 2015
    • December 1, 2015
    ...of the target population). 47Rubber Improvement Ltd v Daily Telegraph Ltd[1964] AC 234. 48 See Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers[1929] 2 KB 331; Grubb v Bristol United Press [1963] 1 QB 309; and Fullam v Newcastle Chronicle & Journal Ltd[1977] 1 WLR 651. 49[2012] EWHC B3 at [78]. 50 Matthew......
  • DUMBO & ORS V. IDUGBOE
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1983 Cases reported in 1983
    • November 22, 2022
    ...CASES REFERRED TO IN JUDGMENT. 1. Phillip Ezekwe v. E.T. Otomewo & Ors. (1957) W.R.N.L.R. 130. 30 2. Cassidy v. Daily Mirror Newspapers (1929) 2 K.B. 331. 3. Cook v. Ward (1830) 4 Moo & p.111. 4. Morris v. Sandess Universe Products (1954) 1 All E.R. 47. 5. Morgan v. Odhams Press Ltd. & Anor......
  • Identification of the Plaintiff
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Libel and Slander Actions
    • June 17, 2004
    ...show that the libel was not of and concerning the plaintiff by proving that he never heard of the plaintiff. Cassidy v. Daily Mirror, [1929] 2 K.B. 331 per Scrutton LJ. at 341 (C.A.). Newstead v. London Express Newspapers, [1940] 1 K.B. 377, per Sir Wilfred Green M.R. at 387. 25 0 CANADIA N......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT