Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v Lufthansa Technik AG

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeJohn Kimbell
Judgment Date10 July 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] EWHC 1789 (Ch)
Date10 July 2020
Docket NumberCase No: BL-2018-002348
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases
  • Bank of Scotland Plc v Peter Lisney Hoskins
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 17 Noviembre 2021
    ...been held that that decision does not establish any new principle of law. In Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v Lufthansa Technik AG [2020] EWHC 1789 (Ch), Deputy Judge John Kimbell QC said: “197. … Both Yam Seng and Sheikh Tahnoon are applications of the general law of implied terms as restated......
  • Portobello Productions Ltd v Sunnymarch Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 7 Noviembre 2022
    ...same order as John Kimbell KC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the Chancery Division, in Cathay Pacific Airways v Lufthansa Technik AG [2020] EWHC 1789 (Ch). The approach he adopted was to ask first whether the term could be implied applying the general principles set out in Marks & Spencer P......
3 firm's commentaries
  • Good Faith in English Contract Law
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 1 Marzo 2022
    ...held that no term was to be implied on either basis, principally because the language of the contract was clear.14. [2020] EWHC 5815. [2020] EWHC 1789 (Ch)16. [2020] EWHC 922 (Comm)Madalena M....
  • Termination Rights In The Event Of Insolvency: Where Are We Now With Ipso Facto Clauses; Are They Still A Potent Weapon In A Creditor's Armoury
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 27 Noviembre 2020
    ...Bratani Ltd v Rockrose [2020] EWHC 58 (Comm), Monk v Largo [2016] EWHC 1837 and Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v Lufthansa Technik AG [2020] EWHC 1789 (Ch). While arguments based on good faith are unlikely to succeed, there are alternatives that given the right combination of facts may succeed.......
  • Good Faith And Maintenance Agreements
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 31 Julio 2020
    ...Pacific Airways Limited v Lufthansa Technik AG [2020] EWHC 1789 (Ch) John Kimbell QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge in the Chancery Division, decided a dispute under a long-term contract for the maintenance, repair and overhaul of aircraft engines ("the Contract"). The ten-year term ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT