Caxton Publishing Company Ltd v Sutherland Publishing Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1936
Date1936

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
43 cases
  • Greenweb Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 July 2008
    ...avoid the intention of the legislature being defeated: per MacKinnon L.J. in Sutherland Publishing Co. Ltd. v. Caxton Publishing Co. Ltd. [1938] Ch. 174, 201. This is an acceptable exception to the general rule that plain language excludes a consideration of anomalies, i.e. mischievous or a......
  • Applin (A.P.) v Race Relations Board
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 27 March 1974
    ... ... has a separate identity just as a company is a different entity from its corporators. Even ... ...
  • Infabrics Ltd v Jaytex Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 February 1980
    ...article in relation to which there had been no relevant act of infringement. 36 In Sutherland Publishing Co. v. Caxton Publishing Co. (1936) Chancery, 323, a case under the 1911 Act, Lord Wright, Master of the Rolls, suggested obiter (at page 334 that an innocent bookseller, by which he mea......
  • Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 12 November 2020
    ...at 321; Lever (1887) 36 Ch D 1 at 7; Siddell v Vickers (1892) 9 RPC 152 at 162; Sutherland Publishing Co Ltd v Caxton Publishing Co Ltd [1936] Ch 323 at 325; Dart (1993) 179 CLR 101 at 110–111; Unilin Beeher BV v Huili Building Materials Pty Ltd [No 2] (2007) 74 IPR 345 at 365–366 [70]. Se......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Intellectual property
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...Project Management Pty Ltd v Di Latte [2018] WASC 14 at [115], per Martino J. 85 Sutherland Publishing Co Ltd v Caxton Publishing Co Ltd [1936] 1 Ch 323 at 336, per Lord Wright MR; Norm Engineering Pty Ltd v Digga Australia Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 761 at [263]–[264], per Greenwood J (appeal allo......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Remedies in Construction Law
    • Invalid date
    ...v Bredero Homes Ltd [1993] 1 WLR 1361 11.59 Sutcliffe v Chippendale and Edmondson (1971) 18 BLR 157 6.12 Sutherland Publishing Co Ltd v Caxton Publishing Co Ltd [1936] Ch 323 12.67 Sutton v Sutton [1984] Ch 184 22.7 Swainland Builders Ltd v Freehold Properties Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 560; [2002......
  • Chapter 12: Damages in tort
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Remedies in Construction Law
    • Invalid date
    ...Corporation Ltd [2013] EWHC 111 (QB); [2013] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 526 at paragraph [221]. 120 Per Lord Wright in Sutherland Publishing Co Ltd v Caxton Publishing Co Ltd [1936] Ch 323 at 336. 121 United Horse-Shoe and Nail Co Ltd v Stewart & Co (1888) 13 App Cas 401; Catnic Components Ltd v Hil......
  • Chapter 13: Damages in tort
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Remedies in Construction Law
    • Invalid date
    ...Corporation Ltd [2013] EWHC 111 (QB); [2013] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 526 at paragraph [221]. 81 Per Lord Wright in Sutherland Publishing Co Ltd v Caxton Publishing Co Ltd [1936] Ch 323 at 336. United Horse-Shoe and Nail Co Ltd v Stewart & Co (1888) 13 App Cas 401; Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & S......
  • Get Started for Free