Caxton Publishing Company Ltd v Sutherland Publishing Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1936
Year1936
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
49 cases
  • Greenweb Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 July 2008
    ...avoid the intention of the legislature being defeated: per MacKinnon L.J. in Sutherland Publishing Co. Ltd. v. Caxton Publishing Co. Ltd. [1938] Ch. 174, 201. This is an acceptable exception to the general rule that plain language excludes a consideration of anomalies, i.e. mischievous or a......
  • Infabrics Ltd v Jaytex Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 February 1980
    ...article in relation to which there had been no relevant act of infringement. 36 In Sutherland Publishing Co. v. Caxton Publishing Co. (1936) Chancery, 323, a case under the 1911 Act, Lord Wright, Master of the Rolls, suggested obiter (at page 334 that an innocent bookseller, by which he mea......
  • Applin (A.P.) v Race Relations Board
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 27 March 1974
    ... ... has a separate identity just as a company is a different entity from its corporators. Even ... ...
  • Commonwealth of Australia v Yarmirr
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 October 2001
    ...1993 at 2877–2878. 160 Mabo v Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1 at 104. 161Sutherland Publishing Co Ltd v Caxton Publishing Co Ltd [1938] Ch 174 at 201; Kingston v Keprose Pty Ltd (1987) 11 NSWLR 404 at 162Jones v Wrotham Park Settled Estates [1980] AC 74 at 105. 163 Diplock, ‘The Court......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Intellectual property
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...Project Management Pty Ltd v Di Latte [2018] WASC 14 at [115], per Martino J. 85 Sutherland Publishing Co Ltd v Caxton Publishing Co Ltd [1936] 1 Ch 323 at 336, per Lord Wright MR; Norm Engineering Pty Ltd v Digga Australia Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 761 at [263]–[264], per Greenwood J (appeal allo......