Chandler v Brown
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2001 |
| Year | 2001 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Apex Global Management Ltd and Another (Claimants/Petitioners) v Fi Call Ltd and Others
...Almhairat, the Global Parties invoked conditions (a), (d) and (g). 14 I can concentrate, I think, on condition (g). As Park J noted in Chandler v Brown [2001] CP Rep 103 (at paragraph 17), three requirements emerge from the wording of the condition: "(1) the claimant must have 'taken steps'......
-
Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v Geoffrey William Guy
...enforce. It is not sufficient that the claimant has engaged in other conduct that may be dishonest or reprehensible: Chandler v Brown [2001] CP Rep 103 at [19]–[20]; ii) The test in that regard is objective: it is not concerned with the claimant's motivation but with the effect of steps whi......
-
The Czech Republic v Diag Human SE
...enforce. It is not sufficient that the claimant has engaged in other conduct that may be dishonest or reprehensible: Chandler v Brown [2001] CP Rep 103 at [19]–[20].” 47 If made out, Mr Riches KC's criticisms of the Claimant's conduct in Luxembourg would have been characterizable as going t......
-
Edward Wojakovski v Arthur Matyas
...enforce. It is not sufficient that the claimant has engaged in other conduct that may be dishonest or reprehensible: Chandler v Brown [2001] CP Rep 103 at [19]–[20]; ii) The test in that regard is objective: it is not concerned with the claimant's motivation but with the effect of steps whi......
Request a trial to view additional results