Chapman v Chapman

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1985
Date1985

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
24 cases
  • Robin Woon Kim Yan; Sime Finance Ltd (Formerly known as United Malaya Banking Finance Ltd)
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1997
  • Michael Wilson and Partners, Ltd v Sinclair
    • Bahamas
    • Court of Appeal (Bahamas)
    • 17 July 2012
    ...v. Frazer (1984) 2 All ER 693 at 698 (No.2) QBD (1984) 1385 at 1390 per. Parker J. 83 But, as Sir Robed Megarry V. C. said in Chapman v. Chapman and others (1985) 1 All ER 757 at 766–767 on the need, in the face of delay by the receiving party to file Bill of Costs, for the paying party to ......
  • Syla Ltd v Real Estate Funding Ltd
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 11 March 2024
    ...the period for filing a Defence had expired but a Defence has already been filed, though irregularly. I also agree with and rely on the Chapman v Chapman [1985] 1 All ER 757 where Megarry VC stated: “ During the argument, I took the view that a failure to comply with the rules, including a......
  • Bierman v Minister of the Environment 1998 Civil Jur. No. 263
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court (Bermuda)
    • 22 November 2001
    ...Concrete Products Ltd. Second Respondent Mr. P. Holder for the Appellant. Mr. M. Diel for the Respondents. Chapman v ChapmanWLR [1985] 1 WLR 599 Pauls Agriculture v SmithUNK [1993] 3 All ER 122 Tonielo v Top Deck Ski Ltd [1998] Times 7 December Southwark London BC v Nejad [1999] Times 28 Ja......
  • Get Started for Free