Chard v Chard

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1955
Date1955
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
25 cases
  • N v N ; L v L ; C v C
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • Bernal (Brian) and Moore (Christopher) v R
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • Invalid date
  • Bernal et Al v Reginam
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 26 January 1996
    ...is sometimes called the presumption of continuance. While it is preferable to characterise this as a presumption of fact Chard v. Chard [1956] p.259 and not a presumption of law (that is, a true presumption) See below 41-03 it is more sensible and more accurate to regard it as a type of ord......
  • R (Smeaton (on Behalf of The Society for The Protection of Unborn Children)) v Secretary of State for Health
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 18 April 2002
    ...[2001] 1 All ER 385, [2000] 3 WLR 1936, HL. Carey v Population Services International (1977) 431 US 678, US SC. Chard v Chard [1956] P 259, [1955] 3 All ER 721, [1955] 3 WLR 954. Dupont Steels Ltd v Sirs [1980] 1 All ER 529, [1980] 1 WLR 142, CA and HL. Eisenstadt v Baird (1972) 405 US 438,......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT