Charm Maritime Inc. v Kyriakou

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1987
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Sunlite Textile Sdn Bhd v Motilal Realty Sdn Bhd (Part.2)
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2007
  • Q & M Enterprises Sdn Bhd v Poh Kiat
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 31 August 2005
    ...be a two-stage process or a one-stage process, telescoping two into one, as was suggested in the case Charm Maritime Inc v Kyriakou [1987] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 433 at 447, does not really matter. The ultimate question remains the same: where should the case be suitably tried having regard to the i......
  • Loo Chooi Ting v United Overseas Bank Ltd
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Dudarec v Andrews and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 March 2006
    ... ... of success in respect of different issues: see for example as in Charm Maritime Inc v Elbourne Mitchell [Unrep. Court of Appeal Transcript 2 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • THE CONTRACTUAL BASIS OF THE ENFORCEMENT OF EXCLUSIVE AND NON-EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...only has the evidential burden of proving the factors in favour of continuing the action (see, eg, Charm Maritime Inc v Kyriakou[1987] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 433 at 444; The Rothnie[1996] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 206 at 211), the position in Singapore is less clear and authorities suggest that it may be the le......
  • FORUM CONVENIENS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1993, December 1993
    • 1 December 1993
    ...was how the English Court of Appeal approached the matter in Charm Maritime Inc. v. Minas Xenophon Kyriakou and David John Mathias[1987] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 433. 135. [1992] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 399. 136. Ibid., at 413 and 414. 137. Ibid. 138. See the text to note 130 ante. 139. Per Robert Goff L.J. i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT