Charterbridge Corporation Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1969
Year1969
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
120 cases
  • Mark Simon Reynolds (as Liquidator of CSB 123 Ltd) v Caroline Stanbury
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 23 September 2021
    ...of companies of which the company is a member, the courts will apply a different test. In Charterbridge Corp Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1969] 2 ALL ER 1185 at 1194….Pennycuick J held that the proper test in the absence of actual separate consideration of the interests of the company, is whethe......
  • Rolled Steel Products (Holdings) Ltd v British Steel Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 June 1984
    ...its Memorandum of Association. Nor does this argument derive any support from the powerful judgment of Pennycuick J. in Charterbridge Corporation Ltd. v. Lloyds Bank Ltd. (1970) Ch. 62, where one finds the following statement of principle (at page 69): "Apart from authority, I should feel ......
  • Madoff Securities International Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Stephen Raven and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 18 October 2013
    ...circumstances, have reasonably believed that the transaction was for the benefit of the company: Charterbridge Corp Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1970] Ch 62 at 74E-F. If so, the director will be treated as if that was his state of mind. The duty to exercise powers for the purposes for which they......
  • Re Horsley & Weight Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 July 1980
    ...ancillary power, Mr. Justice Plowman may have been justified in his conclusion, but not, in my view, otherwise. 27 In Charterbridge Corporation Ltd. v. Lloyds Bank Ltd., (1970) 1 Chancery, 62, a company referred to as Castleford had created a legal charge upon certain of its assets to secur......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
9 books & journal articles
  • SELF-DEALING AND NO-PROFIT RULES: COMPANIES ACT 2016
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2020, December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...Co Bhd [2012] 3 AMR 297; [2012] 3 MLJ 616; Walker v Wimborne (1976) 3 ACLR 529 at 532; Charterbridge Corp Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1970] Ch 62 at 74. 18 Equiticorp Finance Ltd v Bank of New Zealand (1993) 11 ACSR 642. 19 Chan v Zakaria (1984) 53 ALR 417 at 433, per Deane J. See also Don King ......
  • THE RATIONALISATION OF DIRECTORS’ DUTIES IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...of directors out of fear of the “honest lunatic”. 66 Supra n 57. 67 Ibid at 325, [30] following Charterbridge Corp Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd[1970] Ch 62. 68 Ford, Austin & Ramsay, supra n 40, at para 9.340. 69 Company Law, supra n 1, at pp 275—276. 70 It is submitted that the wider meaning of r......
  • Singapore: Financial Assistance and Directors' Duties
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Financial Crime No. 3-3, January 1996
    • 1 January 1996
    ...purpose' exception, not found in Singapore). (15) See Dawall v North Sydney Brick & Trust Co. Ltd. (16) See ref. 10 above, at 61. (17) [1970] Ch 62. (18) SPP Ltd v Chew, Beng Gim [1993] 3 SLR 393; Kumagai Gumi Co. Ltd v Zenecon Ptd Ltd [1995] 2 SLR 297. (19) [1994] 2 SLR 35. (20) See Re Sou......
  • Directors' fiduciary duties under our future company-law regime
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...& Fawcett, Limited [1942] 1 Ch 304 (CA); Thorby v Goldberg (1965) 112 CLR 597; Charterbridge Corporation Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd & Others [1970] 1 Ch 62. 41 See LS Sealy ' "Bona Fides" and "Proper Purposes" in Corporate Decisions' (1989) Monash University LR 265 at 269. Sealy contends that th......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT