Charterbridge Corporation Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1969
Date1969

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
120 cases
  • Mark Simon Reynolds (as Liquidator of CSB 123 Ltd) v Caroline Stanbury
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 23 September 2021
    ...of the group of companies of which the company is a member, the courts will apply a different test. In Charterbridge Corp Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1969] 2 ALL ER 1185 at 1194….Pennycuick J held that the proper test in the absence of actual separate consideration of the interests of the compan......
  • Re Horsley & Weight Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 July 1980
    ...ancillary power, Mr. Justice Plowman may have been justified in his conclusion, but not, in my view, otherwise. 27 In Charterbridge Corporation Ltd. v. Lloyds Bank Ltd., (1970) 1 Chancery, 62, a company referred to as Castleford had created a legal charge upon certain of its assets to secur......
  • Rolled Steel Products (Holdings) Ltd v British Steel Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Ltd. lent it the sum owed to S.S.S., which was paid into the plaintiff's bank account, passed straight from that account to an account in the name of S.S.S. and then to an ... 735H–736A , 738H , 745C–D ) ... Charterbridge Corporation Ltd. v. Lloyds Bank Ltd. [ 1970 ] Ch. 62 ; Introductions Ltd. v. National ... ...
  • Madoff Securities International Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Stephen Raven and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 18 October 2013
    ...circumstances, have reasonably believed that the transaction was for the benefit of the company: Charterbridge Corp Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1970] Ch 62 at 74E-F. If so, the director will be treated as if that was his state of mind. The duty to exercise powers for the purposes for which they......
  • Get Started for Free
35 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 5. The Subservient Subsidiary Situation
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis The liability of the holding company for the debts of its insolvent subsidiaries
    • Invalid date
    ...case, Kinsela v. Russell Kinsela Pty. Ltd. (1986) 10 A.C.L.R. 395 at pp. 401–404. Vide post pp. 244–245. 1 Vide Charterbridge Corporation Ltd. v. Lloyds Bank Ltd. [1970] Ch. 62, p. 74. Vide also the Cork Report, para. 1969, p. 443. Cf. Boulting v. Association of Cinematograph, Television an......
  • SELF-DEALING AND NO-PROFIT RULES: COMPANIES ACT 2016
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2020, January - December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...Co Bhd [2012] 3 AMR 297; [2012] 3 MLJ 616; Walker v Wimborne (1976) 3 ACLR 529 at 532; Charterbridge Corp Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1970] Ch 62 at 74. 18 Equiticorp Finance Ltd v Bank of New Zealand (1993) 11 ACSR 642. 19 Chan v Zakaria (1984) 53 ALR 417 at 433, per Deane J. See also Don King ......
  • Chapter 12: The Development of the Obligation
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Company Directors' Liability and Creditor Protection Part D: The Obligation to Consider the Interests of Creditors
    • Invalid date
    ...be applied in determining whether the directors were liable or not for breach of the obligation. 12.37 The judge applied the ‘Charterbridge Corporation test’ to the obligation to consider creditors. He said that: In relation to an insolvent company, the directors when considering the compan......
  • Chapter 2: The UK corporate law and governance framework as a mechanism to facilitate risk-taking by corporate managers and shareholders
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Corporate Law and Financial Instability
    • Invalid date
    ...noting that there is one situation where courts use an objective test to determine compliance with the duty of loyalty. Indeed, in Charterbridge v Lloyds it was held that when directors take a decision without actual consideration of the company’s interests, the objective test of an intelli......
  • Get Started for Free