Christie v Christie
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
-
Adigun v McEvoy
...truth of any allegation in the pleadings which is material to the reliefs claimed. This test was formulated in Christie v Christie (1873) L.R. 8 Ch App 499, and approved in Riordan v Hamilton (Unreported, High Court, 26 June 2000, Smyth J) where Smyth J., at p. 5 of his judgment, stressed ......
-
Pigozzo v Mineral Resources Ltd
...FCA 1115 Cashin v Cradock (1876) 3 Ch D 376 Chandrasekaran v Commonwealth of Australia (No 3) [2020] FCA 1629 Christie v Christie (1873) LR 8 Ch App 499 Cigarette & Gift Warehouse Pty Ltd v Whelan [2019] FCAFC 16; (2019) 268 FCR 46 Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance......
-
Lai Swee Lin Linda v Attorney-General
...294; [1996] 1 SLR 609, CA (refd) Ching Mun Fong v Liu Cho Chit [2000] 1 SLR (R) 53 [2000] 1 SLR 517 (distd) Christie v Christie (1872-1873) LR 8 Ch App 499 (folld) De Souza Lionel Jerome v AG [1992] 3 SLR (R) 552; [1993] 1 SLR 882 (distd) Denko-HLB Sdn Bhd v Fagerdala Singapore Pte Ltd [200......
-
Andre Penn Claimant v 1. The Director of Public Prosecutions of the Virgin Islands 2. The Attorney General Defendants
...if it is relevant to the issues which are to be determined. Millington v Loring (1881) 6 QBD 190 at 196; Christie v Christie (1873) LR 8 Ch. App. 499 at 503. The Court indicated that it would permit the Claimant to prove the bare contention that the alleged bias of the prosecuting attorney ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Case in Australia for Further Reform to the Cross-Examination and Court Management of Child Witnesses
...vDPP [1973] AC 435.86 Scandalous allegations are those which are put forward to abuse or prejudice the witness, seeChristie vChristie (1873) LR 8 Ch App 499; Cashin vCradock (1876) 3 Ch D would be improper under the new s. 25(1) definition would be equally disallow-able under the old s. 25 ......