Christopher Bernard Upham and Others v HSBC UK Bank Plc
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | King's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
| Judge | Mr Justice Bright |
| Judgment Date | 26 April 2024 |
| Neutral Citation | [2024] EWHC 849 (Comm) |
| Docket Number | Case No: CL-2020-000347 |
Mr Justice Bright
Case No: CL-2020-000347
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES
COMMERCIAL COURT (KBD)
Royal Courts of Justice, Rolls Building
Fetter Lane, London, WC4A 1NL
Philip Coppel KC and Zachary Kell (instructed by Edwin Coe LLP) for the Claimants
Andrew Green KC, Simon Pritchard and Dominic Howells (instructed by Norton Rose Fulbright LLP) for the Defendants
Hearing dates: 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 28, 29 February 2024, 4, 5, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25 March 2024
Approved Judgment
This judgment was handed down remotely at 9:15am on 26/04/24 by circulation to the parties' representatives by e-mail and by release to the National Archives.
| I: Introduction | 8 |
| II: The main entities and individuals | 8 |
| II(i): HSBC | 8 |
| II(ii): Future Films | 9 |
| II(iii): Professional advisers to Future Films/Eclipse | 10 |
| II(iv): The Claimants | 10 |
| III: The Eclipse structure | 10 |
| III(i): The essence of the Eclipse scheme | 10 |
| III(ii): Eclipse Tranches 1 to 5 | 11 |
| III(iii): The roles of Future Films and of the Members | 11 |
| III(iv): The Eclipse Loans and the Lending Bank | 11 |
| III(v): The Disney films | 12 |
| III(vi): The Licensing Agreement | 12 |
| III(vii): Further Disney agreements: the Distributor and the MSP | 13 |
| III(viii): The media analysts | 13 |
| IV: The effect of the Eclipse structure | 13 |
| IV(i): The overall effect | 13 |
| IV(ii): The effect in terms of money-flow | 14 |
| IV(iii): Profit at the level of each LLP | 15 |
| IV(iv): Loan Interest Relief for each individual Member | 15 |
| IV(v): The cost to individual Members and the rationale | 16 |
| V: The Information Memorandum and Addenda | 16 |
| V(i): Marketing to IFAs and to individual investors | 16 |
| V(ii): Parties named in the Information Memorandum | 16 |
| V(iii): The Information Memorandum and trade/trading | 17 |
| V(iv): The Information Memorandum and legal advice | 18 |
| V(v): The Information Memorandum and Contingent Receipts | 18 |
| V(vi): The Addenda | 19 |
| VI: Consultations with Mr Peacock QC | 20 |
| VI(i): Summary | 20 |
| VI(ii): The consultation of 8 September 2005 | 21 |
| VI(iii): The consultation of 20 October 2005 | 21 |
| VI(iv): The consultation of 22 December 2005 | 23 |
| VI(v): Subsequent consultations | 26 |
| VII: The Consolidated Peacock Note of 18 January 2006 | 26 |
| VII(i): Section 1 – Summary of the instructions to counsel | 26 |
| VII(ii): Section 2 – Specific questions | 27 |
| VII(iii): Section 3 – Trade | 27 |
| VII(iv): Paragraph 3.3 – Questioning the entire transaction | 27 |
| VII(v): Paragraph 3.3 – Information about Contingent Receipts | 28 |
| VII(vi): Paragraphs 3.6 to 3.10 – Conclusion on “trade” | 29 |
| VII(vii): Paragraph 11.4 – Circular money-flow | 30 |
| VIII: The DLA Summary | 30 |
| IX: Other information from Future Films for investors/IFAs | 31 |
| IX(i): The Eclipse Key Features document | 31 |
| IX(ii): The Eclipse PowerPoint Presentation | 31 |
| IX(iii): The KPMG Accounting Review | 31 |
| IX(iv): Individual financial illustrations | 32 |
| X: Mr Bowman's role in marketing | 33 |
| X(i): Mr Bowman's Note | 33 |
| X(ii): Mr Bowman's presentation to E&Y partners | 33 |
| X(iii): Information to IFAs | 33 |
| XI: Significant agreements | 34 |
| XI(i): Negotiation of the agreements | 34 |
| XI(ii): The Licensing Agreement | 35 |
| XI(iii): The Marketing Services Agreement | 36 |
| XI(iv): Waiver Letters | 37 |
| XI(v): The Distribution Agreement | 38 |
| XI(vi): The Future-HSBC Agreement | 39 |
| XII: Review of the Eclipse agreements by advising lawyers | 40 |
| XII(i): The reference in the Addenda to a review by DLA | 40 |
| XII(ii): Was there a review by DLA? | 41 |
| XIII: The implementation of the Eclipse scheme | 42 |
| XIII(i): The movement of funds for each Eclipse LLP | 42 |
| XIII(ii): The activities of the MSP | 43 |
| XIII(iii): The activities of Future Films | 44 |
| XIV: Restructuring and Ceasing Member arrangements | 46 |
| XIV(i): Tax deferral and tax avoidance | 46 |
| XIV(ii): Restructuring and Ceasing Member Arrangements | 47 |
| XV: The timeline of the HMRC challenge to Eclipse 35 | 47 |
| XV(i): The HMRC decision re Eclipse 35 | 47 |
| XV(ii): The chronology of the HMRC Proceedings | 48 |
| XV(iii): The relevance of this chronology | 48 |
| XVI: The consequences of the HMRC Proceedings | 48 |
| XVI(i): Effect on tax deferral for Eclipse 35 | 49 |
| XVI(ii): HMRC Follower Notices re other Eclipse LLPs | 49 |
| XVI(iii): Late payment interest | 49 |
| XVI(iv): Dry Tax | 49 |
| XVI(v): Ceasing Member Arrangements | 50 |
| XVII: Action groups | 50 |
| XVII(i): The Newport action group | 50 |
| XVII(ii): The ARC action group | 51 |
| XVIII: Why Eclipse 35 lost in the HMRC Proceedings | 51 |
| XVIII(i): Summary | 51 |
| XVIII(ii): The conclusion that Eclipse 35 was not trading | 52 |
| XVIII(iii) Whether the MSP was the LLP's agent | 53 |
| XVIII(iv): Whether the MSP/LLP contributed to marketing/distribution | 53 |
| XVIII(v): Whether the licence/sub-licence involved speculation | 54 |
| XVIII(vi): Whether Contingent Receipts were too remote | 54 |
| XIX: Divergence from the basis of Mr Peacock QC's advice | 56 |
| XIX(i): The MSP was not the LLP's agent | 56 |
| XIX(ii): No involvement of the MSP/LLP in marketing/distribution | 57 |
| XIX(iii): No documentary record of the MSP's activities | 57 |
| XIX(iv): Burden of proof | 58 |
| XX: Non-divergence from the basis of Mr Peacock QC's advice | 58 |
| XX(i): The prospect of Contingent Receipts | 58 |
| XX(ii): The circular movement of funds | 59 |
| XXI: The core complaint | 59 |
| XXI(i): Outline of the core complaint | 59 |
| XXI(ii): The representation in the Information Memorandum | 60 |
| XXI(iii): The Addenda | 61 |
| XXI(iv): Mr Bowman's Note | 61 |
| XXI(v): The legal significance of this analysis | 61 |
| XXI(vi): The relevant dates | 62 |
| XXII: The Claimants' case on the core complaint | 62 |
| XXII(i): The alleged Advice Representation | 62 |
| XXII(ii): Falsity | 63 |
| XXII(iii): Knowledge/dishonesty | 63 |
| XXII(iv): Joint tortfeasance/conspiracy | 64 |
| XXII(v): Dishonest assistance | 64 |
| XXII(vi): Partnership | 64 |
| XXII(vii): FSMA | 65 |
| XXIII: HSBC's case on the core complaint | 65 |
| XXIV: The Claimants' case as to other representations | 65 |
| XXIV(i): The alleged Trade Representation | 65 |
| XXIV(ii): The alleged Contribution Representation | 66 |
| XXIV(iii): The alleged Profit Representation | 66 |
| XXV: The Claimants' Sample Witnesses | 67 |
| XXV(i): Limited recollection | 67 |
| XXV(ii): Eclipse was a tax deferral scheme | 67 |
| XXV(iii): Reliance on the support of a tax QC | 68 |
| XXV(iv): Investment in films and Contingent Receipts | 68 |
| XXV(v): Circular money-flow | 69 |
| XXV(vi): Awareness of the HMRC challenge to Eclipse 35 | 69 |
| XXV(vii): Restructuring and Ceasing Member Arrangements | 69 |
| XXV(viii): Concern about Dry Tax | 69 |
| XXV(ix): Action groups | 70 |
| XXV(x): Knowledge/ignorance of the role of HSBC | 70 |
| XXV(xi): Evidence of losses | 71 |
| XXV(xii): Tax deferral/aggressive tax avoidance | 71 |
| XXVI: HSBC's factual witnesses | 72 |
| XXVI(i): Mr Bowman | 72 |
| XXVI(ii): Mr Surtees | 73 |
| XXVI(iii): Other HSBC witnesses | 73 |
| XXVII: Expert evidence | 73 |
| XXVII(i): Mr Sills and Mr Fier | 73 |
| XXVII(ii): Relevance | 74 |
| XXVII(iii): Whether there was a real prospect of Contingent Receipts | 74 |
| XXVII(iv): Analysis | 76 |
| XXVII(v): Conclusion | 76 |
| XXVIII: Representations regarding Mr Peacock QC's advice | 76 |
| XXVIII(i): The relevant representations | 76 |
| XXVIII(ii): Representations by Future Films | 77 |
| XXVIII(iii) Representations by HSBC | 77 |
| XXIX: Reliance | 78 |
| XXIX(i): Intention that potential investors should rely | 78 |
| XXIX(ii): Reliance by the Claimants' Sample Witnesses | 78 |
| XXX: Falsity | 78 |
| XXX(i): The Claimants' pleaded case as to falsity | 78 |
| XXX(ii): Did Future Films/Mr Bowman have the expectation/opinion? | 79 |
| XXX(iii): Did Future Films have reasonable grounds? | 79 |
| XXX(iv): Did Mr Bowman have reasonable grounds? | 80 |
| XXXI: Knowledge/dishonesty of Future Films | 81 |
| XXXI(i): Knowledge, blind-eye knowledge, recklessness, dishonesty | 81 |
| XXXI(ii): The Claimant's case in relation to Future Films | 82 |
| XXXI(iii): Future Films' initial negotiations with Disney | 82 |
| XXXI(iv): The contractual negotiations in February/March 2006 | 83 |
| XXXI(v): Mr Clarance's emails in May 2006 | 84 |
| XXXI(vi): Conclusion | 84 |
| XXXII: HSBC's knowledge/dishonesty | 85 |
| XXXII(i): The Claimants' case in relation to Mr Bowman/HSBC | 85 |
| XXXII(ii): Blind-eye knowledge | 85 |
| XXXII(iii): Mr Bowman's Waiver Letters | 86 |
| XXXII(iv): The 7 Arts emails | 87 |
| XXXII(v): Mr Bowman's statements to others | 88 |
| XXXII(vi): Conclusion | 89 |
| XXXIII: Conclusion on deceit | 89 |
| XXXIII(i): Burden of proof | 89 |
| XXXIII(ii): Conclusion | 90 |
| XXXIV: Direct representations by HSBC | 90 |
| XXXV: Joint tortfeasance and conspiracy | 91 |
| XXXV(i): The Claimants' case | 91 |
| XXXV(ii): Analysis and conclusion | 91 |
| XXXVI: Dishonest assistance | 92 |
| XXXVII: Partnership | 93 |
| XXXVII(i): Legal principles | 93 |
| XXXVII(ii): Analysis and conclusion | 93 |
| XXXVIII: FSMA | 94 |
| XXXVIII(i): FSMA and COB 2.1.3R | 94 |
| XXXVIII(ii): The applicability of COB 2.1 | 95 |
| XXXVIII(iii) Alleged breaches of COB 2.1.3R | 96 |
| XXXIX: Causation | 97 |
| XXXIX(i): Appendix 6 | 97 |
| XXXIX(ii): Personal Contributions, HMRC late payment interest | 97 |
| XXXIX(iii): Restructuring Arrangement fees | 97 |
| XXXIX(iv): Ceasing Member Arrangement fees | 98 |
| XXXIX(v): Fees to Future Films and to other advisers, etc. . | 99 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
The King (on the application of Timothy Levy) v The Commissioner for HM Revenue and Customs
...and participant in several of those schemes. A detailed description of the schemes was given by Bright J in Upham v HSBC UK Bank Plc [2024] EWHC 849 (Comm). The Claimant features at Upham §9 as to his co-ownership of Future Films, and at §13 as to his own £2.3m personal contributions. He a......