Christopher Bernard Upham and Others v HSBC UK Bank Plc

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtKing's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
JudgeMr Justice Bright
Judgment Date26 April 2024
Neutral Citation[2024] EWHC 849 (Comm)
Docket NumberCase No: CL-2020-000347
Between:
Christopher Bernard Upham and others
Claimants
and
HSBC UK Bank plc
Defendants
Before:

Mr Justice Bright

Case No: CL-2020-000347

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES

COMMERCIAL COURT (KBD)

Royal Courts of Justice, Rolls Building

Fetter Lane, London, WC4A 1NL

Philip Coppel KC and Zachary Kell (instructed by Edwin Coe LLP) for the Claimants

Andrew Green KC, Simon Pritchard and Dominic Howells (instructed by Norton Rose Fulbright LLP) for the Defendants

Hearing dates: 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 28, 29 February 2024, 4, 5, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25 March 2024

Approved Judgment

This judgment was handed down remotely at 9:15am on 26/04/24 by circulation to the parties' representatives by e-mail and by release to the National Archives.

I: Introduction

8

II: The main entities and individuals

8

II(i): HSBC

8

II(ii): Future Films

9

II(iii): Professional advisers to Future Films/Eclipse

10

II(iv): The Claimants

10

III: The Eclipse structure

10

III(i): The essence of the Eclipse scheme

10

III(ii): Eclipse Tranches 1 to 5

11

III(iii): The roles of Future Films and of the Members

11

III(iv): The Eclipse Loans and the Lending Bank

11

III(v): The Disney films

12

III(vi): The Licensing Agreement

12

III(vii): Further Disney agreements: the Distributor and the MSP

13

III(viii): The media analysts

13

IV: The effect of the Eclipse structure

13

IV(i): The overall effect

13

IV(ii): The effect in terms of money-flow

14

IV(iii): Profit at the level of each LLP

15

IV(iv): Loan Interest Relief for each individual Member

15

IV(v): The cost to individual Members and the rationale

16

V: The Information Memorandum and Addenda

16

V(i): Marketing to IFAs and to individual investors

16

V(ii): Parties named in the Information Memorandum

16

V(iii): The Information Memorandum and trade/trading

17

V(iv): The Information Memorandum and legal advice

18

V(v): The Information Memorandum and Contingent Receipts

18

V(vi): The Addenda

19

VI: Consultations with Mr Peacock QC

20

VI(i): Summary

20

VI(ii): The consultation of 8 September 2005

21

VI(iii): The consultation of 20 October 2005

21

VI(iv): The consultation of 22 December 2005

23

VI(v): Subsequent consultations

26

VII: The Consolidated Peacock Note of 18 January 2006

26

VII(i): Section 1 – Summary of the instructions to counsel

26

VII(ii): Section 2 – Specific questions

27

VII(iii): Section 3 – Trade

27

VII(iv): Paragraph 3.3 – Questioning the entire transaction

27

VII(v): Paragraph 3.3 – Information about Contingent Receipts

28

VII(vi): Paragraphs 3.6 to 3.10 – Conclusion on “trade”

29

VII(vii): Paragraph 11.4 – Circular money-flow

30

VIII: The DLA Summary

30

IX: Other information from Future Films for investors/IFAs

31

IX(i): The Eclipse Key Features document

31

IX(ii): The Eclipse PowerPoint Presentation

31

IX(iii): The KPMG Accounting Review

31

IX(iv): Individual financial illustrations

32

X: Mr Bowman's role in marketing

33

X(i): Mr Bowman's Note

33

X(ii): Mr Bowman's presentation to E&Y partners

33

X(iii): Information to IFAs

33

XI: Significant agreements

34

XI(i): Negotiation of the agreements

34

XI(ii): The Licensing Agreement

35

XI(iii): The Marketing Services Agreement

36

XI(iv): Waiver Letters

37

XI(v): The Distribution Agreement

38

XI(vi): The Future-HSBC Agreement

39

XII: Review of the Eclipse agreements by advising lawyers

40

XII(i): The reference in the Addenda to a review by DLA

40

XII(ii): Was there a review by DLA?

41

XIII: The implementation of the Eclipse scheme

42

XIII(i): The movement of funds for each Eclipse LLP

42

XIII(ii): The activities of the MSP

43

XIII(iii): The activities of Future Films

44

XIV: Restructuring and Ceasing Member arrangements

46

XIV(i): Tax deferral and tax avoidance

46

XIV(ii): Restructuring and Ceasing Member Arrangements

47

XV: The timeline of the HMRC challenge to Eclipse 35

47

XV(i): The HMRC decision re Eclipse 35

47

XV(ii): The chronology of the HMRC Proceedings

48

XV(iii): The relevance of this chronology

48

XVI: The consequences of the HMRC Proceedings

48

XVI(i): Effect on tax deferral for Eclipse 35

49

XVI(ii): HMRC Follower Notices re other Eclipse LLPs

49

XVI(iii): Late payment interest

49

XVI(iv): Dry Tax

49

XVI(v): Ceasing Member Arrangements

50

XVII: Action groups

50

XVII(i): The Newport action group

50

XVII(ii): The ARC action group

51

XVIII: Why Eclipse 35 lost in the HMRC Proceedings

51

XVIII(i): Summary

51

XVIII(ii): The conclusion that Eclipse 35 was not trading

52

XVIII(iii) Whether the MSP was the LLP's agent

53

XVIII(iv): Whether the MSP/LLP contributed to marketing/distribution

53

XVIII(v): Whether the licence/sub-licence involved speculation

54

XVIII(vi): Whether Contingent Receipts were too remote

54

XIX: Divergence from the basis of Mr Peacock QC's advice

56

XIX(i): The MSP was not the LLP's agent

56

XIX(ii): No involvement of the MSP/LLP in marketing/distribution

57

XIX(iii): No documentary record of the MSP's activities

57

XIX(iv): Burden of proof

58

XX: Non-divergence from the basis of Mr Peacock QC's advice

58

XX(i): The prospect of Contingent Receipts

58

XX(ii): The circular movement of funds

59

XXI: The core complaint

59

XXI(i): Outline of the core complaint

59

XXI(ii): The representation in the Information Memorandum

60

XXI(iii): The Addenda

61

XXI(iv): Mr Bowman's Note

61

XXI(v): The legal significance of this analysis

61

XXI(vi): The relevant dates

62

XXII: The Claimants' case on the core complaint

62

XXII(i): The alleged Advice Representation

62

XXII(ii): Falsity

63

XXII(iii): Knowledge/dishonesty

63

XXII(iv): Joint tortfeasance/conspiracy

64

XXII(v): Dishonest assistance

64

XXII(vi): Partnership

64

XXII(vii): FSMA

65

XXIII: HSBC's case on the core complaint

65

XXIV: The Claimants' case as to other representations

65

XXIV(i): The alleged Trade Representation

65

XXIV(ii): The alleged Contribution Representation

66

XXIV(iii): The alleged Profit Representation

66

XXV: The Claimants' Sample Witnesses

67

XXV(i): Limited recollection

67

XXV(ii): Eclipse was a tax deferral scheme

67

XXV(iii): Reliance on the support of a tax QC

68

XXV(iv): Investment in films and Contingent Receipts

68

XXV(v): Circular money-flow

69

XXV(vi): Awareness of the HMRC challenge to Eclipse 35

69

XXV(vii): Restructuring and Ceasing Member Arrangements

69

XXV(viii): Concern about Dry Tax

69

XXV(ix): Action groups

70

XXV(x): Knowledge/ignorance of the role of HSBC

70

XXV(xi): Evidence of losses

71

XXV(xii): Tax deferral/aggressive tax avoidance

71

XXVI: HSBC's factual witnesses

72

XXVI(i): Mr Bowman

72

XXVI(ii): Mr Surtees

73

XXVI(iii): Other HSBC witnesses

73

XXVII: Expert evidence

73

XXVII(i): Mr Sills and Mr Fier

73

XXVII(ii): Relevance

74

XXVII(iii): Whether there was a real prospect of Contingent Receipts

74

XXVII(iv): Analysis

76

XXVII(v): Conclusion

76

XXVIII: Representations regarding Mr Peacock QC's advice

76

XXVIII(i): The relevant representations

76

XXVIII(ii): Representations by Future Films

77

XXVIII(iii) Representations by HSBC

77

XXIX: Reliance

78

XXIX(i): Intention that potential investors should rely

78

XXIX(ii): Reliance by the Claimants' Sample Witnesses

78

XXX: Falsity

78

XXX(i): The Claimants' pleaded case as to falsity

78

XXX(ii): Did Future Films/Mr Bowman have the expectation/opinion?

79

XXX(iii): Did Future Films have reasonable grounds?

79

XXX(iv): Did Mr Bowman have reasonable grounds?

80

XXXI: Knowledge/dishonesty of Future Films

81

XXXI(i): Knowledge, blind-eye knowledge, recklessness, dishonesty

81

XXXI(ii): The Claimant's case in relation to Future Films

82

XXXI(iii): Future Films' initial negotiations with Disney

82

XXXI(iv): The contractual negotiations in February/March 2006

83

XXXI(v): Mr Clarance's emails in May 2006

84

XXXI(vi): Conclusion

84

XXXII: HSBC's knowledge/dishonesty

85

XXXII(i): The Claimants' case in relation to Mr Bowman/HSBC

85

XXXII(ii): Blind-eye knowledge

85

XXXII(iii): Mr Bowman's Waiver Letters

86

XXXII(iv): The 7 Arts emails

87

XXXII(v): Mr Bowman's statements to others

88

XXXII(vi): Conclusion

89

XXXIII: Conclusion on deceit

89

XXXIII(i): Burden of proof

89

XXXIII(ii): Conclusion

90

XXXIV: Direct representations by HSBC

90

XXXV: Joint tortfeasance and conspiracy

91

XXXV(i): The Claimants' case

91

XXXV(ii): Analysis and conclusion

91

XXXVI: Dishonest assistance

92

XXXVII: Partnership

93

XXXVII(i): Legal principles

93

XXXVII(ii): Analysis and conclusion

93

XXXVIII: FSMA

94

XXXVIII(i): FSMA and COB 2.1.3R

94

XXXVIII(ii): The applicability of COB 2.1

95

XXXVIII(iii) Alleged breaches of COB 2.1.3R

96

XXXIX: Causation

97

XXXIX(i): Appendix 6

97

XXXIX(ii): Personal Contributions, HMRC late payment interest

97

XXXIX(iii): Restructuring Arrangement fees

97

XXXIX(iv): Ceasing Member Arrangement fees

98

XXXIX(v): Fees to Future Films and to other advisers, etc. .

99

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
  • The King (on the application of Timothy Levy) v The Commissioner for HM Revenue and Customs
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 9 June 2026
    ...and participant in several of those schemes. A detailed description of the schemes was given by Bright J in Upham v HSBC UK Bank Plc [2024] EWHC 849 (Comm). The Claimant features at Upham §9 as to his co-ownership of Future Films, and at §13 as to his own £2.3m personal contributions. He a......