Churchward v R

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1865
Year1865
CourtCourt of the Queen's Bench
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
30 cases
  • CMG Pension Trustees Ltd v CGI IT UK Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 11 Agosto 2022
    ...of which the Boards were in each case in breach.” 118 Finally, Mr Short relied upon the general principle articulated by Cockburn CJ in Churchward v R (1865) LR 1 QB 173 at 195 (in which, it should be noted, the Court was not prepared to imply a term into the relevant contract): “In consid......
  • New South Wales v Bardolph
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Attorney General Appellant v Martinus Francois Respondent [ECSC]
    • St Lucia
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Lucia)
    • 29 Marzo 2004
    ...THE PAPER IT IS WRITTEN ON" 52 In support of this submission Learned Counsel relied on the following authorities among others. Churchward v The Queen 8 Commercial Cable Co. v Government of Newfoundland 9 Mackey v Attorney General for British Columbia 10 Auckland Harbour Board v The Lei......
  • Wheeler v Commissioners of Public Works in Ireland
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 24 Junio 1901
    ......Lancaster JusticesELR 22 Q. B. D. 484. Burrell v. TuohyIR [1898] 2 I. R. 271. Campbell v. HornsbyUNKUNKIR I. R. 6 C. L. 37; 7 C. L. 82, Campbell v. HornsbyUNKIR I. R. 6 C. L. 37; per Fitzgerald, B., at p. 51. Churchward v. The QueenELR L. R. 1 Q. B. 173. Coe v. WiseENRELR 7 B. & S. 831; L. R. 1 Q. B. 711. Colchester v. KewneyELR L. R. 1 Ex. 368, at p. 380; affirmed — 2 Ex. 253. Commissioner of Valuation v. The Sligo Harbour CommissionersIR [1899] 2 I. R. 214. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Consideration and Form
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Enforceability
    • 4 Agosto 2020
    ...For discussion of the law concerning the implication of terms, see Chapter 19, Section D. 43 See, for example, Churchward v The Queen (1865), LR 1 QB 173 at 195, Cockburn CJ; Berliner Gramophone Co Ltd v Scythes (1916), 31 DLR 789 (Sask SC); Canada Cycle and Motor Co Ltd v Mehr (1919), 48 D......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT