City of London Corporation v Appleyard
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1963 |
Year | 1963 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
8 cases
- Daniel s/o D William v Luhat Wan and Others and Luhat Wan v Social and Welfare Services Lotteries Board and Others
-
Parker v British Airways Board
...control, but his defence failed. 24 South Staffordshire Water Co. v. Sharman was followed and applied by McNair J. in City of London Corporation v. Appleyard, (1963) 1 W.L.R., 982. There money was found in a safe let into one of the walls of a building by workmen who were demolishing that b......
-
Waverley Borough Council v Fletcher
...not be applicable." 19 A.L. Goodhart's analysis of Sharman and of the principle has powerful judicial support. In Corporation of London v. Appleyard [1963] 1 WLR 982, a dispute about entitlement to bank-notes found in a wall safe on a building site, McNair J. commented, at 987, on Lord Russ......
-
R v Michael Anthony Lewis
...followed: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Cheatley v The Queen (1972) 127 CLR 291 City of London Corporation v Appleyard (1963) 1 WLR 982 Everall v Lozuet (1987) 30 A Crim R 207 Forbes v Traders Finance Corporation Ltd (1971) 126 DLR 429 Rein v Lane (1867) LR 2 QB 144 R v Good (......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
The site
...73.1; JCWC Standard Form of Building Contract, 2006 edition, clause 34.1; SIa Building Contract, 1st edition, 2016, clause 36(1). 558 [1963] 1 WLr 982. 559 [1963] 1 WLr 982 at 986–987. 560 [1963] 1 WLr 982 at 989–990. 561 For example, under the ancient Monuments and archaeological areas act......
-
Finders keepers? A historical survey of lost and abandoned property and the law.
...better right to the property (as per South Staffordshire Water Co. v. Sharman, [1986] 2 QB 44; City of London Corporation v. Appleyard, [1963] 1 WLR 982, 2 All ER Further Interpretations in Canadian Law ... the common law has leaned heavily on the side of the finders over other potential co......
-
All is not lost: the law of lost and found.
...found chattels, even if the chattel's existence is not known by the land occupier (Corporation of London et al. v. Appleyard et at., [1963] 2 All E.R. 834). If the item is found on public property (like an airport), the occupier generally has insufficient control to claim Therefore, if we f......