City of London Land Tax Commissioners v Central London Railway Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 1913 |
| Year | 1913 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
11 cases
-
Maclaren et Al v The Attorney-General of Quebec and Hanson Bros
... ... Newlay Bridge Co. F5 ; City of London Tax Commissioners v. Central London ... The land so granted (which lies along the left bank of the ... Central London Railway F31 .) In that case the plots under consideration ... ...
-
John Hanita Paki and Others v Attorney-General of New Zealand for and on Behalf of The Crown
...presumption: Tilbury v Silva (1890) 45 ChD 111 (CA). 115 Commissioners for Land Tax for the City of London v Central London Railway Co [1913] AC 364 (HL) at 379 per Lord Shaw; Southern Centre of Theosophy Inc v State of South Australia [1982] AC 706 (PC) at 715; and Attorney-General v Leigh......
-
William Gardiner Paton and Another v Adrian Todd
...long before serious difficulties in tracing the title to the strip might arise. As Lord Moulton said in City of London Land Tax Commissioners v Central Railway Co [1913] AC 364, 384, "The law cannot permit that the land under the highway should belong to nobody." This consideration seems to......
-
John Hanita Paki & ORS v ATTORNEY-GENERAL of New Zealand For and on Behalf of The Crown
...presumption: Tilbury v Silva (1890) 45 ChD 111 (CA). Commissioners for Land Tax for the City of London v Central London Railway Co [1913] AC 364 (HL) at 379 per Lord Shaw; Southern Centre of Theosophy Inc v State of South Australia [1982] AC 706 (PC) at 715; and Attorney-General v Leighton ......
Get Started for Free