Clare & Company v Dresdner Bank

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1915
Date1915
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 cases
  • Damayanti Kantilal Doshi v Indian Bank
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 3 August 1999
    ...that for that purpose, branches of a bank are treated as separate entities: R v Lovitt [1912] AC 212, 219 and Clare & Co v Dresdner Bank [1915] 2 KB 576, and further that there was nothing to show that there was any agreement made with IBS whereby they would undertake such obligations. The ......
  • Damayanti Kantilal Doshi v Indian Bank
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 11 November 1998
    ...For this purpose, branches of a bank are treated as separate entities: R v Lovitt [1912] AC 212 at 219 and Clare & Co v Dresdner Bank [1915] 2 KB 576. 13.Furthermore, in the case of a fixed deposit, repayment is subject to the terms of the contract. As stated by Poh Chu Chai (at p 40): When......
  • Fairfield Sentry Ltd ((in Liquidation)) & Krys v Citco Bank Nederland NV and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 28 February 2012
    ...Corp v Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Navigator Holdings plc [2006] UKPC 26, [2007] 1 AC 508, Clare & Co v Dresdner Bank [1915] 2 KB 576, Libyan Arab Foreign Bank v Bankers Trust Co [1989] QB 728, Walsh v National Irish Bank [2007] IEHC 325 (Unrep, McKechnie J, 4/5/2007), Joac......
  • McK v RM
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 12 February 2003
    ...Ltd. [1993] Ch. 223 approved. Alcock v. Smith [1892] 1 Ch. 238; Cammell v. Sewell (1858) 3 H & N 617; Clare & Co. v. Dresdner Bank [1915] 2 K.B. 576 considered. 5. That s. 11(7)(b) of the Statute of Limitations 1957 applied to actions by common informers or actions for penalties or forfeitu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bank and Customer Law in Canada. Second Edition
    • 19 June 2013
    ...Toronto-Dominion Bank, [1990] 4 W.W.R. 73, 47 B.L.R. 54, [1990] B.C.J. No. 549 (C.A.) ......... 299, 369 Clare & Co. v. Dresdner Bank (1915), 2 K.B. 576 .............................................. 156 Clarke v. London & County Banking Co., [1897] 1 Q.B. 552 ............................ 1......
  • Banking Business
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bank and Customer Law in Canada. Second Edition
    • 19 June 2013
    ...Act , R.S.C. 1985, c. B-4, s. 50. 14 Woodland v. Fear (1857), 7 El. & B1. 519, 119 E.R. 1339 (Ex. Ch.); Clare & Co. v. Dresdner Bank (1915), 2 K.B. 576; Joachimson v. Swiss Bank Corp ., [1921] 3 K.B. 110 (C.A.). 15 Royal Bank of Canada v. Boyce; Royal Bank of Canada v. Wildman (1966), 57 D.......
  • Banking Business
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Bank and Customer Law in Canada
    • 8 September 2007
    ...Act , R.S.C. 1985, c. B-4, s. 50. 14 Woodland v. Fear (1857), 7 El. & B1. 519, 119 E.R. 1339 (Ex. Ch.); Clare & Co. v. Dresdner Bank (1915), 2 K.B. 576; Joachimson v. Swiss Bank Corp ., [1921] 3 K.B. 110 (C.A.). 15 Royal Bank of Canada v. Boyce; Royal Bank of Canada v. Wildman (1966), 57 D.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT