Clark v Molyneux

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1877
Date1877
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
60 cases
  • Horrocks v Lowe
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • Invalid date
    ...of qualified privilege (post, pp. 142G-H, 145H - 146B, D-H, 149E-F, 150B-C,E-F, 151F-G, 152A-B, D-G, 153F-G). Clark v. Molyneux (1877) 3 Q.B.D. 237, C.A. and dicta of Lord Dunedin in Adam v. Ward [1917] A.C. 309, 326-327, 330, H.L.(E.) applied. Royal Aquarium and Summer and Winter Garden So......
  • ‘Truth’ (N.Z.) Ltd v Holloway
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
  • Reynolds v. Times Newspapers Ltd. et al.,
    • Canada
    • October 28, 1999
    ...of Sess.) 1016, refd to. [para. 144]. McKerchar v. Cameron (1892), 19 R. (Ct. of Sess.) 383, refd to. [para. 144]. Clark v. Molyneux (1877), 3 Q.B.D. 237 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 160]. Statutes Noticed: European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1953), C......
  • Neethling v Du Preez and Others; Neethling v the Weekly Mail and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Bresler (1970) 398 US 6; Ocala Star-Banner Co v Damron (1971) 401 US 295; Botteril v Whytehead (1879) 41 LT 588 at 590; Clark v Molyneux (1877) 3 QBD 237 at 244; McLean v Murray 1923 AD 406 at 416; Clerk and Lindsell Torts 16th ed (1989) para 21-105 at 1165; De Waal v Ziervogel 1938 AD 112 ......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Cyberlibel: Information Warfare in the 21st Century? Part VIII
    • June 15, 2011
    ...(2002), 41 C.H.R.R. D/274 .................................................................................. 33 Clark v. Molyneux (1877), 3 Q.B.D. 237 ....................................................................................... 289 Clarke t/a Elumina Iberica UK v. Bain and Anor, ......
  • The Defence of Qualified Privilege
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Guide to the Law and Practice of Anti-SLAPP Proceedings Part V. The Merits Hurdle
    • June 13, 2022
    ...Laing (1957), 11 D.L.R. (2d) 276 at 279, 282–83 (B.C.C.A.), Per Sheppard J.A. (Sidney Smith J.A. concurring), citing Clark v. Molyneux (1877), 3 Q.B.D. 237 at 247. Kelsie v. Canada (Attorney General) , [2003] N.J. No. 232, 2003 NLSCTD 139 per Barry J. at para. 33. The burden of proving actu......
  • Pleadings
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Libel and Slander Actions
    • June 17, 2004
    ...malice. A plea of "falsely and maliciously publishing" in the statement of claim is not a plea of actual malice. Clark v. Molyneux (1877), 3 Q.B.D. 237 at 24647, discussed in Baumann v. Turner (1993), 105 D.L.R. (4th) 37 per Southin J.A. at 38 (B.C.C.A.). 1) Necessity to Plead Particulars o......
  • Express Malice
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Libel and Slander Actions
    • June 17, 2004
    ...knowingly published a defamatory falsehood is normally conclusive that he or she was actuated by express malice. In Clark v. Molynewc (1877), 3 Q.B.D. 237, Brett LJ. stated at 247: If a man is proved to have stated that which he knew to be false, no one need inquire further. Everybody assum......
  • Get Started for Free