Clarke v Ramuz
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1891 |
| Date | 1891 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
-
Lyons v Thomas
...care to maintain the property in a reasonable state of preservation. Tempany v. HynesIR [1976] I.R. 101 and Clarke v. RamuzELR [1891] 2 Q.B. 456 followed. 4. The vendor was guilty of wilful default in allowing damage to the property. 5. The purchaser, being a frequent visitor to the premise......
-
Chen Con-Ling Tony v Quay Properties Pte Ltd
...that the duty of trusteeship extends to taking reasonable care that the property does not deteriorate pending completion: Clarke v Ramuz [1891] 2 QB 456. In that case, Lord Coleridge CJ referred to the obligation as having “to use reasonable care to preserve the property in a reasonable sta......
-
Bowthorpe Holdings Ltd and Another v Hills and Others
...that on 24th April 1998 Peter Hills was still the sole legal owner and owed to Bowthorpe duties of care comparable to those referred in Clarke v Ramuz [1891] 2 QB 456, 459 and Lysaght v Edwards [1876] 2 Ch.D.499, 507 so that "..any attempt by the defendant, Peter Hills, to dispose of those ......
-
Michaels and Another v Harley House (Marylebone) Ltd
...the property sold to the purchaser, and so far as he is a trustee he is so only in respect of the property contracted to be sold". 25and Clarke v Ramuz 1891 2 QB 456, 459 – 60 where Lord Coleridge CJ said "It appears to be well established in equity that, in the case of a contract for the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Equity and Trust
...the balance between his interest and that of the purchaser to be maintained? Referring to Lord Coleridge CJ”s judgment in Clarke v Ramuz[1891] 2 QB 456, the court held that the yardstick applicable to the vendor”s behaviour vis-à-vis the property was that of a ‘reasonably prudent owner’. Wh......