Cleary v Booth

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1893
Date1893
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Jeffery PATTINSON and Spencer FLACK
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 Diciembre 2002
    ...for, and thus power over, the behaviour of the child. I however agree with Elias J, in his analysis in §§ 17–18 of his judgment of Clearly v Booth [1893] 1 QB 465 and Ryan v Fildes [1938] 3 All ER 516, that such delegation was seen as constituted by the general act of sending the child to s......
  • R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education & Employment
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 Diciembre 2002
    ...[1982] ECHR 7511/76, ECt HR. Christian Education South Africa v Minister of Education [2001] 1 LRC 441, SA Const Ct. Clearly v Booth [1893] 1 QB 465, Costello-Roberts v UK[1994] 1 FCR 65, ECt HR. Darby v Sweden (1991) 13 EHRR 774, [1990] ECHR 11581/85, ECt HR. Edgington v Fitzmaurice (1885)......
  • R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education & Employment
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 15 Noviembre 2001
    ...was equally open to them. 21 The common law sometimes describes the power as being delegated by the parent to the teacher. In Cleary v Booth [1893] 1Q.B.465 a head teacher was prosecuted for assault for caning a boy because of his unacceptable conduct on the way home from school. The court......
  • Ramsay v Larsen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT