Clifford v Timms

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1907
Year1907
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Nevin v Nevin
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 7 February 2019
    ...Hollington v Hewthorn had ‘unaccountably’ overlooked a significant authority – the decision of the Court of Appeal in Hill v Clifford [1907] 2 Ch. 236. There, a deed of partnership in a dental practice entitled one partner to determine the partnership if another was guilty of professional ......
  • Conlon v Simms
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 December 2006
    ...facie evidence of the fact that Mr Simms was struck from the Roll of Solicitors on the grounds of his dishonesty: Hill v Clifford [1907] 2 Ch 236. The court is entitled to reach its own view of the facts as found by the SDT/Divisional Court: Clifford v Timms [1908] AC 12. Although judicial ......
  • Hudgell Yeates & Company v Watson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 November 1977
    ...make any difference? There are three cases to which I would refer which give some assistance about this. In Hill v. Clifford (1907) 2 Chancery 236, which was an action for dissolution of a dentists' partnership when one of the partners had been struck off the register, Sir John Gorell Barne......
  • Patrick Nevin and Another v Catherine Nevin
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 March 2013
    ...EVIDENCE AMDT ACT 1853 MCILKENNY v CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE WEST MIDLANDS & ANOR 1980 QB 283 1980 2 WLR 689 1980 2 AER 227 CLIFFORD v TIMMS 1907 2 CH 236 HUNTER v CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE WEST MIDLANDS 1982 AC 529 1981 3 WLR 906 1981 3 AER 727 JORGENSEN v NEWS MEDIA (AUCKLAND) LTD 1969 NZLR 961......
  • Get Started for Free