Clouston & Company Ltd v Corry
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1906 |
| Year | 1906 |
| Date | 1906 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
144 cases
-
Elphina Abraham v Sunny Caribbee Herbal and Spice Company Ltd
...Distilleries Limited (Barbados) [1999] UKPC 39 (21 July 1999); Privy Council Appeal No. 43 of 1998. 2. Clouston & Co. Limited v. Corry [1906] A.C. 122. 3. Dietmann v London Borough of Brent [1988] I.C.R. 801. 4. Wilson v Racher (1974) ICR 428. 5. Phillip James v Road Town Wholesale (Trading......
-
Laws v London Chronicle (Indicator Newspapers) Ltd
...from the Judgment of the Privy Council delivered by Lord James of Hereford in the case to which Mr. Stewart referred of Clouston & Company Limited v. Corry. in 1906 Appeal Cases, the passage being taken from page 129. I will read a rather larger passage which provides the context. Lord Jame......
-
Teo Chew Seng v Singapore Anti-Tuberculosis Association
...law to be applied is stated in the judgment of the Privy Council delivered by Lord James of Hereford in Clouston & Co Ltd v Corry [1906] AC 122 (at p 129): Now the sufficiency of the justification depended upon the extent of misconduct. There is no fixed rule of law defining the degree of m......
- Malaysia Airline System Bhd and Another v Ismail Nasaruddin Abdul Wahab
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Interpretation Of Statutes
...The sufficiency of the justification for removal depends largely upon the degree of misconduct: see Clouston & Co. Ltd. v. Corry (1906) A.C. 122 at 129.” - Per Katsina-Alu, J.C.A. in A-G. Cross River State & Anor. v. Esin Suit No. CA/E//42/88; (1991) 6 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 197) 365 at 375. (2) “Th......