Cohen v Rothfield
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1919 |
| Year | 1919 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 cases
- Sabah Gas Industries Sdn Bhd v Trans Samudera Lines (S) Sdn Bhd
-
Mike Trading and Transport Ltd v R Pagnan & Fratelli (Lisboa)
...foreign proceedings, and the injunction should not normally be granted unless the foreign proceedings are vexatious or oppressive (see Cohen v. Rothfield (1919) at page 410 per Lord Justice Scrutton, and Castanho v. Brown & Root (U. K..) Ltd. (1980) 1 Weekly Law Reports 833. This is so even......
-
Kallang Shipping SA Panama v Axa Assurances Senegal (The Kallang), (Kallang, The)
...foreign proceedings, and the injunction should not normally be granted unless the foreign proceedings are vexatious or oppressive (see Cohen v. Rothfield, [1919] 1 K.B. 410 per Lord Justice Scrutton, and Castanho v. Brown & Root (U.K.) Ltd., [1980] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 423; [1980] 1 W.L.R. 833......
-
Bank of Tokyo Ltd v Karoon (Note)
...from the foreign procedure which he could not obtain in the English court (see in particular Hyman v. Helm (1883) 24 Ch. D. 531, and Cohen v. Rothfield (1919) 1 K.B. 410). That criterion was very rarely fulfilled: for examples where it was fulfilled see Armstrong v. Armstrong (1892) P. 98......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Limitations of Access at the National Level: Forum Non Conveniens
...A.C. at 474 (citing Sim v. Robinow, [1892] Sess. Cas. (R.) 665, 668 (Scot. 1st Div.). [18]. Id. at 476. [19]. Cohen v. Rothfield, [1919] 1 K.B. 410, 413-414 (U.K.). [20]. St. Pierre v. South Am. Stores (Gath & Chaves) Ltd., [1936] 1 K.B. 382, 398. [21]. The Atlantic Star, [1974] A.C. 436. [......
-
The Recognition and Enforcement of Wills and Successions in the European Union - Brussels Ill?
...she survived her husband, the property went to the beneficiaries of the husband and not to her. Today, "3 See Orr-Lewis v. Orr-Lewis [1919] 1 KB 410, at 414, comments of Scrutton L.J.; "Where the plaintiff in the foreign action is not plaintiff, but defendant, in the English action, the cas......