Cohn against Davis
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
| Judgment Date | 22 November 1788 |
| Date | 22 November 1788 |
English Reports Citation: 126 E.R. 49
IN THE COURTS OF COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER CHAMBER
Cohn against Davis
[80] cohn against davis. Saturday, Nov. 22d, 1788. Although an exception to bail haa been regularly entered, and the defendant's attorney having had verbal notice of it proceeds by giving notice of justification, and attempting to justify, yet notice in writing of such exception must have been given, to make the sheriff liable to an attachment for not bringing in the body (a)1. An exception to bail was regularly entered in the Blazer's book, of which the defendant's attorney had verbal notice, but afterwards proceeded by giving notice of justification, and attempting...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
62 cases
-
Schoultz v Voorsitter, Personeel-Advieskomitee van die Munisipale Raad van George, en 'n Ander
...Du Preez en Gericke c verwys het (bl 61). Mnr Van Rensburg, die waarnemende voorsitter nadat mnr Gericke horn onttrek het, se niks nie (bl 80-81). In sy repli-serende verklaring erken applikant da't mnr Gericke ontsteld was (bl 86). Du Preez er ken dat hy aan Hart gestel het dat sy getuieni......
-
Theron en Andere v Ring van Wellington van die NG Sendingkerk in Suid-Afrika en Andere
...sake beperk is of tot gevalle waar die verleende bevoegdheid doelmatigheids- of wenslikheidsoorwegings behels nie. Dit blyk duidelik veral op bl. 80 van eersgenoemde uitspraak waar Appèlregter OGILVIE THOMPSON nog so onlangs as 1971 beklemtoon dat tensy die in die Union Steel Corporation -s......
-
S v Prinsloo
...hê. In die saak van S v Liebenberg, 1965 (2) SA 79 (O), het ERASMUS, R., die volgende aangaande die inhoud van so 'n eedsverklaring gesê, op bl. 80C-E: D 'In die onderhawige geval moet ek, . . . verder daarop wys dat hierdie ondersoek net begin kon word ingevolge die statuut indien daar vol......
-
S v Du Preez
...toon 'n groot mate van waarskynlikheid aan dat die beskuldigde ook die misdaad gepleeg het in 'n besondere aanklagte (sien Katz se saak op bl. 80). Verwys kan ook word na die saak van R v Viloen, 1947 (2) SA 56 (AA) op bl. 63, en verder die saak van Rex v Gokool, 1965 (3) SA 461 (N) op bl. ......
Get Started for Free
