Coldman v Hill

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1919
Date1919

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
48 cases
  • Gee Hup & Company v Yeo Swee Hern trading as Chop Yong Bee Huat
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Houghland v R R Low (Luxury Coaches) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 13 Marzo 1962
    ...think, Is very clear from the words used by Lord Justice Bankes In the oase to which we were referred of ( Coldcan v. Hill 1919 volume 1 King's Bench Division, page 443). M page 449 in a posssge which appears to me to be important in this case, the learned Lord Justice says: "I think the la......
  • Re Davis (S.) & Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Phipps v. New Claridge's Hotel, Ld. (1905) 22 T. L. R. 49, and Coldman v. Hill [1919] 1 K. B. 443, followed ... In September, 1939, the applicant deposited furniture for storage with the company (hereinafter called ... ...
  • Mervyn Linton v Donald Haynes and Samuel Facey
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Evidence 1
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 10. Part I Evidence 1
    • 30 Junio 2016
    ...occurred without negligence or default on his part. See: Ogugua v. Armels Transport Ltd. (1974) N.S.C.C. 169 at 172, Coldman v. Hill (1919) 1 K.B. 443 and Houghland v. R.R. Low (Luxury Coaches) Ltd. (1962) 1 Q.B. 694 at 697-698. So long as the claim, as in the present action, is properly fr......
  • Preliminary sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 10. Part I Preliminary sections
    • 30 Junio 2016
    ...(Pt. 271) 627. ……………..314 Coker v. Olukoga & Ors. (1994) 2 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 329) 648. …………...........…………216, 214, 154 Coldman v. Hill (1919) 1 K.B. 443 ………………………………………........…………………….391 Cole v. Akinyele (1960) 5 F.S.C. 84 (1960) S.C.N.L.R. 192……………......…….………………..619 Colony Development Boa......