Cole v Harris
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1945 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
Fredco Estates Ltd v Bryant
...as Neele v. Del Soto — they cannot be said to have had a tenancy which would be a protected tenancy. 25 We were referred to the case of Cole v. Harris, reported in 1949 King's Bench at page 474. That is a case where the headnote says: "In June 1943 the defendant let to the plaintiff three r......
-
Antoniades v Villiers (A.P.) and Another (A.P.)
...room is not let as a separate dwelling within the meaning of section 1 of the Rent Act 1977: see Neale v. Del Soto [1945] K.B. 144 and Cole v. Harris [1945] K.B. 474. Section 21 of the Act of 1977 confers some rights on a tenant who shares essential living premises with his landlord, and ......
-
Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
...been directed to the requirement that the premises be let as a "separate" dwelling: see, in particular, Neale v Del Soto [1945] KB 144; Cole v Harris [1945] KB 474; Kenyon v Walker [1946] 2 All ER 595; Winters v Dance [1949] LJR 165; Baker v Turner [1950] AC 401; Hayward v Marshall [19......
-
Goodrich v Paisner
...I do not wish to cast any doubt upon the correctness of the decisions of the Court of Appeal in Neale v. Del Soto [1945] 1 K.B. 144, or Cole v. Harris [1945] 1 K.B. 474, and what have been called their satellite cases. Nor, if any formula must be found, can I think of a better one than that......
Request a trial to view additional results