Cole v Langford
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1898 |
| Date | 1898 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
- AETNA Universal Insurance Bhd (No 1); Teo Kim Huatt
- Seruan Gemilang Makmur Sdn Bhd v Kerajaan Negeri Pahang Darul Makmur
-
Jaffray v Society of Lloyd's
...say 'You obtained the judgment by fraud and I will have a rehearing of the whole case' until that fraud is established.” Flower v Lloyd, Cole v Langford [1898] 2 QB 36 and Baker v Wadsworth (1898) 67 LJ (QB) 301 show that the right procedure for that purpose is by action. That, however, the......
-
Camden London Borough Council v Herwald
...was to appeal against the assessment; not having appealed, they could not resist the issue of a warrant. By way of contrast, in Langford v. Cole (1910) 102 Law Times 808, where a single assessment of poor rate was made on property described in the rate book as 'mansion house and grounds' an......
Request a trial to view additional results