Collins v Stimson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Thomson Hill Pte Ltd v Chang Erh and Another and Another Appeal
    • Singapore
    • Court of Three Judges (Singapore)
    • 6 July 1992
    ......, the issue of the certificate of fitness, and until then, he could not pay the sum to either party without the consent of the other: see Collins v Stimson [1883] 11 QBD 142 Now the solicitor-stakeholder had misappropriated the two sums. Applying the test enunciated in Grant v O`Leary [1955] ......
  • American Jewellry Company Ltd v Khemlani and Others
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal
    • 2 December 2004
    ...of "Khemlani". A stakeholder is to pay the money over once "Khemlani" becomes entitled to it. See Hale v Burnell [1911] 2 Ch. 551 and Collins v Stimson (1883) 11 QBD 142 at 144. 7 A stakeholder as Harrington v Hoggart 109 E.R.902 or (1880) 1 B & Ad 577 at 586 and 587 illustrates is not lia......
  • Ong Hun Seang and Others v Yeoh Oon Teik and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 19 July 1996
    ....... . . . . Collins v Stimson (1883) 11 QBD 142 is cited. In that case a bankrupt having disposed of his goods in fraud of his creditors opened an account in a bank ......
  • Joseph v Jordan
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT