Collins v Stimson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1883 |
| Date | 1883 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Thomson Hill Pte Ltd v Chang Erh and Another and Another Appeal
... ... , the issue of the certificate of fitness, and until then, he could not pay the sum to either party without the consent of the other: see Collins v Stimson [1883] 11 QBD 142 Now the solicitor-stakeholder had misappropriated the two sums. Applying the test enunciated in Grant v O`Leary [1955] ... ...
-
American Jewellry Company Ltd v Khemlani and Others
...of "Khemlani". A stakeholder is to pay the money over once "Khemlani" becomes entitled to it. See Hale v Burnell [1911] 2 Ch. 551 and Collins v Stimson (1883) 11 QBD 142 at 144. 7 A stakeholder as Harrington v Hoggart 109 E.R.902 or (1880) 1 B & Ad 577 at 586 and 587 illustrates is not lia......
-
Ong Hun Seang and Others v Yeoh Oon Teik and Others
...but until any of these events occur he may not pay the deposit to either party without the other`s consent. Collins v Stimson (1883) 11 QBD 142 is cited. In that case a bankrupt having disposed of his goods in fraud of his creditors opened an account in a bank with the proceeds. He entered ......
-
Coal Harbour Properties Partnership v. Liu et al., 2006 BCCA 385
...Ontario Ltd. et al. (2005), 200 O.A.C. 159; 76 O.R.(3d) 362; 256 D.L.R.(4th) 490 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 6]. Collins v. Stimson (1883), 11 Q.B.D. 142, refd to. [para. Howe v. Smith (1884), 27 Ch. D. 89 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 9]. Kemble v. Farren (1829), 6 Bing. 141; 130 E.R. 1234, refd to.......
Request a trial to view additional results