Colls v Home and Colonial Stores Ltd

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Date1904
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
80 cases
  • Allen v Greenwood
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • October 16, 1978
    ...is insufficient to make it work. 28 The starting point for the resolution of these contending arguments must be in the case of Colls v. Home & Colonial Stores Ltd., (1904) Appeal Cases, 179, which does, as it seems to me, establish the basic principle that the measure of the light towhich,......
  • Midtown Ltd v City of London Real Property Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • January 20, 2005
    ...He referred me to an extract from Megarry and Wade paragraph 18–165 and part of the decision of the House of Lords in Colls v Home and Colonial Stores Ltd. [1904] AC 179 at page 205 and further a decision of Tapling v Jones [1865] 11 HLC 290, which shows that in a case of easements of land......
  • Lyme Valley Squash Club Ltd v Newcastle under Lyme Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • McGrath v Munster and Leinster Bank Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • January 1, 1960
    ...offices] is during the afternoon hours when the source of natural light would be west of south." Colls v. Home and Colonial Stores, Ltd. [1904] A. C. 179 and Smyth v.Dublin Theatre Co., Ltd.[1936] I. R. 692 followed and applied. Cur. adv. vult. Dixon J. :— The plaintiff complains of an inte......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Litigation - Remedies and Practice
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part IV. Restrictive covenants (freehold land)
    • August 30, 2016
    ...I would cautiously (in the light of the fact that each case turns on its facts) approve the observations of Lord Macnaghten in Colls [1904] AC 179, 193, where he said: ‘In some cases, of course, an injunction is necessary – if, for instance, the injury cannot fairly be compensated by money ......
  • Creation of Easements and Profits
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part I. Easements and profits à prendre
    • August 30, 2016
    ...‘ nec vi, nec clam, nec precario ’). 33 Shuttleworth v Le Fleming (1865) 19 CB (NS) 687. 34 Colls v Home and Colonial Stores Ltd [1904] AC 179 at 190, per Lord Macnaughton. 35 [2008] 1 AC 221 at [9]; Davies v Williams (1851) 16 QB 546; Seddon v Bank of Bolton (1882) 19 Ch D 462; Dance v Tri......
  • Particular Easements and Examples of Analogous Remedies of Relevance to Development
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part I. Easements and profits à prendre
    • August 30, 2016
    ...500 at 508. 38 Levet v Gas Light and Coke Co [1919] 1 Ch 24. 39 Allen v Greenwood [1980] Ch 119. 40 Colls v Home and Colonial Stores Ltd [1904] AC 179. 41 Carr-Saunders v Dick McNeil Associates Ltd [1986] 1 WLR 922; Moore v Hall (1878) 3 QBD 178 at 182. 42 Ough v King [1967] 1 WLR 1547; Dea......
  • INJUNCTIONS AND DAMAGES Michael BRYAN
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...& Maxwell, 19th Ed, 2014) at para 11–035. 32Holmes v Wilson(1839) 10 A & E 503; (1839) 113 ER 190. 33 Colls v Home & Colonial Store Ltd [1904] AC 179 at 192–193, per Lord Macnaghten, and 212–213, per Lord Lindley, adopted a discretionary approach more favourable to a damages award. See also......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT