Combatting the financing of terrorism in Austria, Germany, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. A hopeless case?

Pages782-795
Published date07 October 2019
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-10-2017-0058
Date07 October 2019
AuthorFabian Maximilian Johannes Teichmann
Subject MatterFinancial risk/company failure,Financial compliance/regulation,Financial crime
Combatting the nancing of
terrorism in Austria, Germany,
Liechtenstein and Switzerland
A hopeless case?
Fabian Maximilian Johannes Teichmann
Teichmann International AG, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Abstract
Purpose Whilst the existing literature focuses on developing prevention mechanisms for banks, this
paper aims to show how feasible it still is in Austria, Germany, Liechtenstein and Switzerland to nance
terrorismwithout getting detected.
Design/methodology/approach A three-step research process, including both qualitative and
quantitative methods,was applied. The empirical ndings are based upon qualitativecontent analysis of 15
informal interviews with illegal nancial services providers and 15 formal interviews with compliance
expertsand law enforcementofcers.
Findings During those interviews, concreteand specic methods of nancing terrorism and limiting the
risks of facinga criminal prosecution were discussed. The interviewswere analyzed based upon a qualitative
content analysis. To assess the risk, whichcriminals, a quantitative survey among 181 compliance ofcers
was conductedto determine what leads to investigations.
Research limitations/implications The ndings are limited to the 30 intervieweesand181 survey
participantsperspective.
Practical implications The practical implicationsinclude suggestions for providing law enforcement
and intelligenceagencies with new tools, such as remoteonline searches of electronic devices.
Originality/value Whilst the empirical ndings are based upon Austria, Germany, Liechtenstein and
Switzerland,the results could be applied on European level.
Keywords Literature, Drug trafcking, Financing, Terrorism nancing, Terrorism, Criminal
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
The nancing of terrorism has been combatted sincethe (1980s. Since the efforts before the
9/11 attacks were insufcient, they have been intensied throughout the past 15 years
(Pieth, 2002; 115 f.; Weintraub, 2002, p. 53). In addition to war efforts in Iraq and
Afghanistan, many nations focused on ghtinga nancial war against terrorism(Barrett,
2009,p.9;Davis, 2003, p. 269). The ultimategoal is to both eradicate terrorism and prosecute
terrorists (Betti, 2006, p. 1104). Fighting the nancing of terrorism seems to be a rather
useful tool since terroristattacks are usually associated with costs and terroristshence need
money (Freeman, 2011,p.461;Gurulé, 2010,p.21).
However, combatting the nancing of terrorism is a very complex and expensive task.
The costs are easily justied by confronting them with those of terrorist attacks, including
military reactionsand economic effects (Frey et al., 2007,p.1;Barrett,2009,p.8;Brownet al.,
2004, p. 861; Kaufmann et al.,1997, p. 83; Gläser and Shapiro, 2002, p. 205). Hence, it is
generally agreed that ghtingthe nancing of terrorism could be worth the effort. However,
since Europe has recently had to face a signicant number of low cost terror attacks, the
JMLC
22,4
782
Journalof Money Laundering
Control
Vol.22 No. 4, 2019
pp. 782-795
© Emerald Publishing Limited
1368-5201
DOI 10.1108/JMLC-10-2017-0058
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/1368-5201.htm

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT