Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Cure & Deeley Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Year1961
Date1961

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
46 cases
  • Burford v Durkin (HMIT)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 October 1990
    ...in the judgment: Agricultural, Horticultural and Forestry Training Board v Aylesbury Mushrooms Ltd WLR[1972] 1 WLR 190 C & E Commrs v Cure & Deeley Ltd ELR[1962] 1 QB 340 Craven (HMIT) v White ELRTAX[1989] AC 398; [1988] BTC 268 Honig & Ors v Sarsfield (HMIT) TAX[1986] BTC 205 Horder v ......
  • Mak Sik Kwong v Minister of Home Affairs, Malaysia
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago v Thomas
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 19 January 1979
    ...Francis v. Yiewsley & West Drayton R.D.C. [1958] 1 Q.B. 478, or ‘the well known rule’ as Sachs J. described it in Commissioners of Customs & Excise v. Cure & Doeley Ltd. [1962] 1 Q.B. 340, 357, ‘that a statute should not be construed as taking away the jurisdiction of the courts in the abs......
  • Attorney General v Thomas
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • DELEGATION OF POWERS FOR MODERN GOVERNMENT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2019, December - January 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates' Court [2017] EWHC 1152 at [29]–[31], citing Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Cure and Deeley Ltd [1962] QB 340. 58 Act 9 of 2017. 59 Cap 216, 2006 Rev Ed. 60 Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (7 February 2017) vol 94 at pp 35 and 60 (Desmond Lee,......
  • Participation and Constitutionalism
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 38-3, September 2010
    • 1 September 2010
    ...17 [1969] 2 AC 147. See also R v Lord Chancellor; Ex parte Witham [1998] QB 575; Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Cure & Deeley Ltd [1962] 1 QB 340. 18 The House of Lords effectively read the words 'valid not purported' into the rel evant statutory provision to qualify the word 'determ......