Company, Re a (No 006834 of 1988)ex parte Kremer

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1989
Date1989

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
50 cases
  • Horgan v Murray
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1998
    ...IN RE 1991 BCLC 597 A COMPANY, IN RE 1996 2 BCLC 192 MULGREW V O'BRIEN 1953 NI 10 A COMPANY, IN RE 1987 BCLC 94 A COMPANY, IN RE 1989 BCLC 365 Synopsis: [1997] 3 IR 29 -[ 1998] 1 ILRM 110 1 Judgment of Mr Justice Francis D Murphydelivered the 9th day of July 1997 [BARRINGTONCONC] 2As the t......
  • De Sousa and Another v Technology Corporate Management (Pty) Ltd and Others
    • South Africa
    • 31 March 2017
    ...Co Ltd (‘TheIkarian Reefer’) [1993] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 68 [QB (Com Ct)]: referred toRe a Company (No 006834 of 1988), Ex parte Kremer [1989] BCLC 365 (ChD): dictum at 368 appliedRe a Company (No 00709 of 1992); O’Neill and Another v Phillips and Others[1999] UKHL 24 ([1999] 1 WLR 1092 (HL); [199......
  • Hawkes v Cuddy and Others (Nos 1 & 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 13 December 2007
    ...the authorities for such a stark right of unilateral withdrawal. There are cases, such as Re a company (No 006834 of 1988), ex p Kremer [1989] BCLC 365, in which it has been said that if a breakdown in relations has caused the majority to remove a shareholder from participation in the manag......
  • Dean Joseph Banfield v Paul Robert Edwards
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 8 August 2024
    ...the authorities for such a stark right of unilateral withdrawal. There are cases, such as Re a Company (No 006834 of 1988), ex p Kramer [1989] BCLC 365, in which it has been said that if a breakdown in relations has caused the majority to remove a shareholder from participation in the manag......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Q&A Company Law
    • Invalid date
    ...[1983] 2 All ER 854 44–45, 47 Company, A (No 004475 of 1982), Re [1983] 2 WLR 381 120, 121 Company, A (No 006834 of 1988), Re, ex p Kremer [1989] BCLC 365 125 Company, A (No 007623 of 1984), Re [1986] BCLC 362 120 Cooke v Cooke [1997] 2 BCLC 28 83 Cook v Deeks [1916] 1 AC 554 90, 104 Cope (......