Comptoir Commercial Anversois v Power, Son & Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1920 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
59 cases
-
Tsakiroglou & Company Ltd v Noblee Thorl, G.m.b.H.; sub nom Albert D Gaon & Company v Société, Interprofessionelle Des Oleagineux Fluides Alimentaires
...the contract. I will deal with this at once and shortly. 8Similar words to these in clause 6 fell to be construed in Comptoir Commercial Anversois v. Power, Son & Company [1920] 1 K.B. 868. At p. 878 Bailhache, J. said: "Now, if I give to the word 'shipment' the widest meaning of which it ......
-
Pioneer Shipping Ltd v B.T.P. Tioxide Ltd (Nema)
... ... case and in cases that have come before the Commercial Court since the judgment of the Court of Appeal was given, ... Section 1(3) withdraws the previous power of an arbitrator to accede to a request to state his award ... ...
-
Compagnie Algerienne de Meunerie v Katana Societa di Navigatione Marittima, S.P.A. (Nizetti.)
...is erroneous in principle. In the language of Lord Justice Scrutton in ( Comptoir Commercial Anversois v. Power Son & Co. 1920 1 King's Bench, page 868, at page 899), "It must be such a necessary term that both parties must have intended that it should be a term of the contract and have onl......
- Chong Yoon Huat v Tokio Marine Life Insurance (Malaysia) Bhd
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Contract Law
...to cite observations by Scrutton LJ himself in yet another case, Re Comptoir Commercial Anversois and Power, Son and Co”s Arbitration[1920] 1 KB 868 at 899, which are in fact very similar to those which the same judge espoused in another case that is the main case law support for the approa......
-
Agency
...into their agreement. This is in keeping with the view of Scrutton, L.J. in In re Comptoir Commercial Anversions and Power , Sons & Co. (1920) 1 K.B. 868, where he said:- “…..it must be such a necessary term that both parties must have intended that it should be a term of the contract…..” (......
-
EMPLOYERS’ RESPONSIBILITY FOR ARCHITECTS’ CERTIFICATIONS: THE IMPLIED TERM THAT NEVER WAS HONG HUAT AND BEYOND
...the High Court Judgment. 29 See para 18 of the Hong Huat Case. 30 28th Ed, Vol 1, para 13-004. 31 See para 19 of the Hong Huat Case. 32 [1920] 1 KB 868 at 899. The Court of Appeal had in fact previously cited this passage with approval: see Energy Shipping Co Ltd v UDL Shipping (Singapore) ......