Concha v Murrieta. De Mora v Concha

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date1888
Year1888

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
14 cases
  • De Be‚che v South American Stores (Gath & Chaves) Ltd, and the Chilian Stores (Gath and Chaves) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • December 11, 1934
    ...the law applicable to the case, the Court is at liberty to look at those passages and to consider what is their proper meaning. ( Concha v. Murrieta (1889) 40 Ch. Div. 543. See also the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Buerger v. New York Life Assurance Coy. (1927) 43 T.L.R. 19In t......
  • Davids Holdings Pty Ltd v Attorney General
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Re Credicom Asia Ltd
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • July 30, 1999
    ... ... Concha v Murnietta (1889) 40 Ch. D 543 ;with a number of exceptions, the rule ... ...
  • O'Callaghan v O'Sullivan
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court (Irish Free State)
    • March 31, 1925
    ...be taken as an exposition of the settled principles upon which the Court will deal with the proof of foreign law. Conchav. Murrietta,ELR 40 Ch. D. 543, does not depart from the principles laid down by Lord Langdale, as in that case there was a conflict of expert witnesses as to the foreign ......
  • Get Started for Free