Concha v Murrieta. De Mora v Concha

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date1888
Year1888

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • De Be‚che v South American Stores (Gath & Chaves) Ltd, and the Chilian Stores (Gath and Chaves) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 11 December 1934
    ...the law applicable to the case, the Court is at liberty to look at those passages and to consider what is their proper meaning. ( Concha v. Murrieta (1889) 40 Ch. Div. 543. See also the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Buerger v. New York Life Assurance Coy. (1927) 43 T.L.R. 19In t......
  • Re Credicom Asia Ltd
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 30 July 1999
    ...upon the effect of the foreign law, there is a general rule that it must be proved upon evidence as a fact. Concha v Murnietta (1889) 40 Ch. D 543;with a number of exceptions, the rule requires that the fact by proved by expert evidence. The Sussex Peerage (1844) 11c. & F.85 63 See also Sea......
  • O'Callaghan v O'Sullivan
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court (Irish Free State)
    • 31 March 1925
    ...be taken as an exposition of the settled principles upon which the Court will deal with the proof of foreign law. Conchav. Murrietta,ELR 40 Ch. D. 543, does not depart from the principles laid down by Lord Langdale, as in that case there was a conflict of expert witnesses as to the foreign ......
  • Kolbin & Sons v Kinnear & Company S.S. "Altai." Kolbin & Sons v United Shippling Company S.S. "Eduard Woermann."
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session (Inner House - Second Division)
    • 20 March 1930
    ...L. R., 2 C. P. 38. 5 Baron de Bodes' case, 8 Ad. & El. 208; The Sussex Peerage case, 11 Cl. & Fin. 85. 6 Concha v. MurrietaELR, (1889) 40 Ch. D. 543, Cotton, L.J., at p. 550; Buerger v. New York Life Assurance Co.UNK, 43 T. L. R. 601, Scrutton, L.J., at p. 604;Russian Commercial and Industr......
  • Get Started for Free