CONNORS BROS.Ltd and Others v CONNORS
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1940 |
| Year | 1940 |
| Date | 1940 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
18 cases
- Loh Holdings Sdn. Bhd. v Peglin Development Sdn. Bhd. and Another
-
Rush Hair Ltd v Hayley Gibson-Forbes and Another
...a buyer. In the latter case, the correct approach was set out by Viscount Maugham for the Privy Council in Connors Bros Ltd v Connors [1940] 4 All ER 179, at 190–191: "To take a simple case, if the managing director of a private company, owning all or the great majority of its shares, desir......
-
Findex Group Limited v McKay
...Rail Authority of NSW [1982] HCA 24; 149 CLR 337 Commissioner for Corporate Affairs v Green [1978] VR 505 Connors Bros Ltd v Connors [1940] 4 All ER 179 D Bates & Co v Dale [1937] 3 All ER 650 Deeks v Little Moreton Trading Pty Ltd (1995) 14 WAR 58 Del Casale v Artedomus (Aust) Pty Ltd [200......
-
John Barnes v Donald Williams
...9% portion of the shares in Allied. See Halsbury's Laws of England, 4th edition, Vol. 47 paragraph 24, footnote 1, Nordenfelt and Connors Bros. v. Connors [1940] 4 All. E.R. 179 52 The particular non-solicitation term agreed to is not in my view unnecessarily wide. As Mrs. Mayhew points out......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Illegality
...of terms rather than by a rewriting of the terms: the blue-pencil test. 148 142 See, for example, Connors Bros Ltd v Connors , [1940] 4 All ER 179 (PC) [ Connors ]; Giannone & Stampeder Motor Hotel Ltd (1963), 41 DLR (2d) 242 (Alta SCTD); McAllister v Cardinal (1964), 47 DLR (2d) 313 (Ont H......
